From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D3D138AD6 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A070E0936; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 015ABE08C6 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 08:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lams18 with SMTP id s18so28625731lam.13 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:18:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3jfD37bdb7Ryoh2tNjug3DEGPk72FNfJ+EBVVXzSVwQ=; b=EriEv/ek6ZHYck/gB41zChkv43MnGw84xH9WrGEcEyHo6E4DJ8DK5gO+wfzB4IW0DH qdP4S7cquXJv+HjIJaVI/l27ry9tJaE+ijqv+RfH6N4ONwZxdoCLiT2VGH0iAGJmqSek 3djsbT7anQI3dRQHNcwbW8MnL8vrQ591IHtYhWtwpcAAiGrW4zyyKdlo/9TcFLs8Mt0V Bhr5VzYp/DsTRc3j2HYr9bSC1MpgQM9P+ljjBTSxk8c0fw7/rxbdqpBFlaA11pkdsyXm YDxnWs9te60HpebAK6gVDxBlIMqevvjJe80r4enQZH8lXx4+yPFFxrSGE8borF2NUk7M 6cOg== X-Received: by 10.112.53.137 with SMTP id b9mr23314385lbp.66.1425284302516; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from digger ([178.71.224.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wp8sm2238432lbb.30.2015.03.02.00.18.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:18:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 03:18:18 -0500 From: German To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi? Message-Id: <20150302031818.fcd2e09cc296a263cf533b72@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20150302001151.51160896ba0a4853a7a4a4c4@gmail.com> <20150302030342.38245bd0077d6c186589145a@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d4b9d66c-ef36-4ec2-9101-42b8901da5e5 X-Archives-Hash: baed2725f6b485696e5d08b8453704f9 On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600 Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600 > > Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote: > > > > > > > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi > > > files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is > > > /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created > > > /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi during install by copying kernel image file > to > > > it and supposedly it was for efibootmng. I think gummiboot has created > its > > > own gummibootx64.efi. Is that safe to delete */boot/bootx64.efi? Than= ks > > > > > > They are the same image; do an md5sum of both, you'll see that they h= ave > > > the same checksum. > > > > > > I believe Boot/BOOTX64.EFI is the default location where the "BIOS" (= or > > > whatever is called in UEFI systems) looks for an image to boot, > > > and gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi is just a copy. I'm not sure, but I wo= uld > > > not delete it: > > > > gummiboot creates both copies of the file. > > > > Well, no, I have created */boot/bootx64.efi manually and > */gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi was created by gummiboot install. >=20 > In my machines boot/bootx64.efi was created by gummiboot, and it's the sa= me > ile as gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi (same checksum). >=20 > What does bootctl says? bootctl: command not found. How to use bootctl? >=20 > Regards. > -- > Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s > Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias > Universidad Nacional Aut=F3noma de M=E9xico --=20 German