From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-160123-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03778138A1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:08:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD1BFE0B0D;
	Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:08:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail144c7.megamailservers.com (mail774.megamailservers.com [69.49.98.84])
	(using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49B2E09F6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-POP-User: admin@sys-concept.com
X-VIP: 69.49.109.100
Received: from syscon7.localdomain (S01060050da7ae68c.ed.shawcable.net [68.149.90.13])
	by mail144c7.megamailservers.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id sAO384tV021464
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:08:05 -0500
Received: by syscon7.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BE3C22007E8; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:08:23 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:08:23 -0700
From: Joseph <syscon780@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p594::gentoo failed
Message-ID: <20141124030823.GC12212@syscon7>
References: <20141123192148.GA12212@syscon7>
 <20141124004535.GB12212@syscon7>
 <m4u6h1$5a8$1@ger.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m4u6h1$5a8$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.5472A115.010C,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules: 
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=fuzlOjIf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=C3ZDv51cNVt4vJz/79I2xQ==:117
	a=C3ZDv51cNVt4vJz/79I2xQ==:17 a=SDcUNfBxAAAA:8 a=BDKbP5mgAAAA:8
	a=Unq3plm5DvEA:10 a=M1kyBYkWWGkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8
	a=5y4faFyK3SkA:10 a=7mOBRU54AAAA:8 a=rq9BU2w8LqFYbL2H22wA:9
	a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=ICUHqGOo6S0A:10 a=UunPtzK90jIA:10
X-Origin-Country: CA
X-Archives-Salt: 6c382a54-ac6e-40d4-99ee-2b318e5e7aa3
X-Archives-Hash: c49fb177389fb71672ba323192d39534

On 11/23/14 18:52, walt wrote:
>On 11/23/2014 04:45 PM, Joseph wrote:
>
>> * ERROR: dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p594::gentoo failed (compile phase):
>
>On my ~amd64 machines I have ruby-2.0.0_p598 installed.  Is there a
>reason you want 594 instead of 598?

I don't really care which one is it, as long as it will compile.
According to current tree:
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-lang/ruby

ruby-2.0.0_p594 is the current stable version.
should I unmask 598?

-- 
Joseph