From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C688138A1A for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5192E0A5A; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6199BE0809 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marcec.fritz.box ([93.181.44.4]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5tzh-1Y8VUu3ZxR-00xqCC for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:02:58 +0100 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:02:49 +0100 From: Marc Joliet To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The future of linux, and Gentoo specifically now Message-ID: <20141123200249.413b1e22@marcec.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: References: <546EE70C.2050506@yourstruly.sx> <54721CEC.1020902@libertytrek.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/04JsPKlcupjtwLr_0zIdL2k"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5JPCM5Fz1UCYdFzSOZl7oRFpgsufiSrR64O86uXqKUqLyljArwS eyYQSRE3h9JwH/T0yE0gJ9FW+fLr7Bh6lbK2SqHO06hfZqjjvJ4PtAhODmwhlFPfNAecWBI DLfeGBR9EeQTdby9PK0JvNiTD5FgsAjSGGGnkcfTBXxuMma6LVzKXb0ebCJ6W3yuklqUef8 BbPnaeZzppjB4xJ+RWlSQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Archives-Salt: d9f9390b-3d4a-421a-ae59-252268bc8b61 X-Archives-Hash: 9c8dc90217161119fc7828abe92166c3 --Sig_/04JsPKlcupjtwLr_0zIdL2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:07:08 -0600 schrieb Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s : > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Tanstaafl w= rote: [...] > > To answer the OPs question correctly... > > > > Since OpenRC is the *default* - for now at least - it is *king*, and > > systemd is the red-headed step-child, and as such OpenRC is and will be > > 100% fully supported. [...] > > With that in mind, it is also 100% on the *systemd proponents* to make > > sure that *systemd* is 'fully supported' as an *alternate* init system. >=20 > And that's exactly what's happening... in Gentoo, GNOME officially > supports only systemd, not OpenRC. >=20 > Who is king again? [...] I get the distinct feeling that you two should probably read the LWN article again. --=20 Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup --Sig_/04JsPKlcupjtwLr_0zIdL2k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUci9fAAoJEL/Q5oYsiHj0OCMQAI7nPImx/ANQBgnFmvIMyDs8 E5dG+jDXsEfJgNIBsY4nxHNMbWi0IiyASWqx+sDk+CdU438rb4kcPwwuTlx7r1NV x3ZP1uG2H7ekkfhB2gSIV4nWGIVhkw6Mp46jNbS9p1BEsfpqrsoE4JrcqF3uaGIr KB1q61JWr/LcN4eAVSX1/alZulxmgXzATbbv7vE2Xu70/gg1YT//9mflO4J0MAU4 gSKxHDTdG78j7fFbo+jaf3/Vhffo5YL6SV3gvPBEa7y9uP3SIe1splpZUz90m7aQ VcCcjUUAHxZ41RhML5WtjzgSZXiuJ/dPniB0Rn/DYHGk72o/9eGPi6Gd/AhJo+/z JQb0aFa0uXCVxwv1uWTqKzLAmHIDmgjHXWs/dUZgUxakihP0K0FmC3KsfwzmPBUh 5xmfi/z7Qdv0ksjPLHRf9E7yN154x8QW8bGA233jZx2D6XC9vNXo40dZXsyN9pwt Bhut7Y/4SJ01lWtP3E0s3F0N8XQIWjMzXfOIpkN1SmCBJzc29oAAchF4DNauS6U1 wO8MuJFDkfbN7kq1Aww0DQsKx7inE62k8EJKqiHPcBCN1iR0f93E3UC+PuIcKA// NLYuh6vAb4J7ekjF8+jbehvRq0wNdJ22vihXUxKFWSdchX5P9X2+eQoXQMxTKvEl hBpNX2PPpg4YS2RMgJZH =0Tna -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/04JsPKlcupjtwLr_0zIdL2k--