From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EAC138825 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E76BE08C4; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C354E08B2 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id bs8so2951685wib.17 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:27:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=O/mkxl3CZI31kLxLBVqlYQx/rslOw5bEb+10A/q4zz8=; b=CmQd/SFfAB2nmioYyFxbo3G0AconOywbK2326U8GqkJl4r7GIHHX3B6n2AYoXTSvse TP/3HREMt59pnrJPnPJLuuSp4Uv44g2jViDZarn3RBLbYTzyK+IBRqDDnjJt5zCpuj6Z Df1SpOCpKybdq23wdogPAblcCYV2Bwernifpy5/0J7azqaHgZkwa+qpw47QF4Zv4je+S wRapEP5hqeXStf8MM+k3uFqHcBYYzttzwO9OFLDQmVGbEU7L7Jgte0APeX6AuJaMcTrK B6C3ysOWiWHYzwcW3FjahAYt687lloI8JYFHYRH4ir7XuG4V75WdQndJLifeSktWVMf2 3u+A== X-Received: by 10.180.37.130 with SMTP id y2mr43614486wij.78.1415741249730; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:27:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ce16sm10024250wjb.34.2014.11.11.13.27.28 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:27:28 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc 4.7.3 --> 4.8.3 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:27:22 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.16.5-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20141111210356.6326a0e9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20141111210356.6326a0e9@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1849496.UypYvZH5FY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201411112127.25142.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: a345103b-ad09-4326-821b-1a6f3e0b3272 X-Archives-Hash: bbe7b30c1d3f9e63f1861c93ccd6a328 --nextPart1849496.UypYvZH5FY Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 11 Nov 2014 21:03:56 Neil Bothwick wrote: > Why? The compiler is not used by running software. If there was an ABI > change meaning that mixing programs compiled with the two versions would > cause problem, emerge -e would be prudent, but that hasn't happened for a > long time. You don't dismantle and reassenble your car just because you > bought a new set of spanners... Hmmm ... O_o I can't recall when I rebuilt system (or was it world) because gcc changed,= =20 but if I were to guess I would say it was back in 2004/5. I don't recall=20 experiencing problems waiting for packages to rebuild themselves when a new= =20 version became available in portage. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1849496.UypYvZH5FY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJUYn89AAoJELAdA+zwE4YemLUIALEXivDZ9ThezaANf3rGfCwh F9PCbc9LzTQ2uk9yyvn9l6mLed/SnDT32iOfnOoC1E8pN49ftjoieJE5biXk52oh DMwxk7UiLYJhg+LjN+S0hPaSqtTxb1Cdc9J4nBWv7kEadLL5qUfDhrSrd5iga4/D C+aYnZU5hxT/oTE3eXbhfZ8FtXkm8PLJ7kQfr1g6zxUntNzobImNf+bDr/tfFG8Q EIQEM5oawJ02P31GJNpMCIl10beHwjCfBbqF4OSdyKQhc2DVqGiU47FCKDHY9JuY 70hjnnhM/NnhszSRNr2i1f3jVnDn2qr1JKwCpid+/05TsbmmOmm8bKUM3tXHNcw= =p8lh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1849496.UypYvZH5FY--