From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB468138825 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80E2CE09EF; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45524E09D9 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:20:37 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoNAOatTlTO+KTO/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BLIk0y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwE6HCgLCyETEg8FJTcaiB4Jy3IBAQgCAR+RDxaDF4EeBYtkhiNdinyIAYw/gW+EFh8vgksBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AgoNAOatTlTO+KTO/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BLIk0y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwE6HCgLCyETEg8FJTcaiB4Jy3IBAQgCAR+RDxaDF4EeBYtkhiNdinyIAYw/gW+EFh8vgksBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,797,1406606400"; d="scan'208";a="96610406" Received: from 206-248-164-206.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([206.248.164.206]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2014 00:20:35 -0500 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:20:26 -0500 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:20:26 -0500 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ? Message-ID: <20141111052026.GA2194@waltdnes.org> References: <54245C36.50507@gentoo.org> <5424F3F2.2020808@gentoo.org> <54609BD1.2000206@libertytrek.org> <5460DE61.20008@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5460DE61.20008@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Archives-Salt: 929ad381-affa-4065-ae85-ab2ab4722edf X-Archives-Hash: 1ffd8ca03bb0811273632f6d7d96190e On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote > I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild* > will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with > instructions on moving to something else, but that's not something we > are even planning at the moment, so sys-fs/udev is still the de facto > proper upstream /dev manager. What worries me is that Lennart has been able to get modifications done to the kernel, e.g. kdbus. I know this'll sound paranoid, but how long before he pushes a patch that requires systemd to run the linux kernel? -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications