From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD3313881B for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E16CE09F1; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA92E08EB for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id y10so3539092wgg.27 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 03:31:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=g9uelhKIspUvX3OTj+oMterq5udgKFraLlm4fduZIeM=; b=yrbm6H2ZkmA86dOKBmC6H36L32dxmjNchdE/BWGq9ajkaDcsjZKKQlXig8bYEG7Rix FcN7EfU7FZbOPo324vEIm7mPmqHCXPQNr+l1hNX1rQxB4xWPxH0xqmlqTmMHpzdMfuZb 6aEmlfq1/5XgrTWnWggZWfSSqBSTh93UzyoUsoHjmNwu8p3nOLoBqYEjxaM0eKfjHf5p LnfEn17rn1D6xz7nL7SX7Db+O0xBsWiZ1Iu3droyN5rrU6Is+kpvWNItAjW4V2pI8pqU 2fEIZdUa6/6RkuQANlKw9+8IyZZw/4N8OSAHdwG5QryKYRm6Jun4t4bFVxZTPS3/YJzg 1xag== X-Received: by 10.194.87.4 with SMTP id t4mr24515507wjz.42.1413714705017; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 03:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm5654019wiy.9.2014.10.19.03.31.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 03:31:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Routing Problems Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 11:31:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <5441E251.1090204@alectenharmsel.com> <201410181737.54981.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <5442ADC3.9070404@alectenharmsel.com> In-Reply-To: <5442ADC3.9070404@alectenharmsel.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1786202.bWOFCbBdVC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201410191131.22556.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 44bec72b-63fe-4d46-9a74-bc06bfdd2ce5 X-Archives-Hash: 412e8b3bb979a5d1b6ae01afcb5476bc --nextPart1786202.bWOFCbBdVC Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 18 Oct 2014 19:13:23 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > arpscanning the entire subnet results in 3 responses, with 2 being > displayed and 1 being dropped by the kernel. Oh! I wonder if this is your problem. I can't answer why 1 response is be= ing=20 dropped by the kernel. Have you set up some fancy tcp wrappers or firewall= =20 rules at the desktop? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1786202.bWOFCbBdVC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJUQ5L6AAoJELAdA+zwE4Ye9xcH+QGzyx6VvgOnYOb17eKA9OaF 9djTu+7rjZDUhLaAa1nZ+uHvQmO+bbwo3ewZL+BHPfA99+yr2F0tT5VffIIfiEM2 gNQEUL82xCQiCDIw8ngjAOdgYOMQXY9nZYxrHG5YHdW7DjhW9JSfZeGkEgFpZ63u l63PGrXzN4nmYoAbTk6TWYNMvQyjnm3+NnshwCLi8LUyWZFF5CusRHVj3aXSuNc0 LHmb3Qyp5SslgS+GvFLLEiKhaHWm31j9CIuNiy2qOp8GYDc5LxXN4VHhMkblKFGe dkaFXTl6ODeQL4mGfKA6v0OzEoGBerPEEr4CzqJkStOypPxRrZ85O0TNv8Ny/4U= =lk8y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1786202.bWOFCbBdVC--