From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159259-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEFF138247
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:46:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05E04E0CB0;
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:46:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99EA4E0CA7
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m15so5484647wgh.4
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2014 02:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=LmSjqtP93xu02euZtydwwQNP5YvWknk460/5FpJ6gd0=;
b=ngDyoFQhndpbs9lzsV9oBhJce/qjBEfzZwMxfCcSARDcrvErO6SBXxWAaRBELSCTTu
gvMCeWm7uu5EwUpAv6vRofJOudmGYOEih5Wm1QNUBG5Yxq7fl17QhoQf+yN6jc4slQ0U
U7mHPquNA8FUtea/CFXm9IehXWEikqMw2JtNF//U+Sdc9udrp1ldHYjI0us6yzeGABb8
q7qFfeTJ1DD3/mO0k19Z2LHm6ayiFQEBfThYeulE7y+c9JmuugKqlx9qrkM2ytTarS/A
gbw7+w8WnBYpjjnzQ4SUP7Qo7CAK05+C0+PURxt3G0u/k9XqItDnS801nheIFIY18D6M
A4QQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.186.4 with SMTP id fg4mr9659924wic.73.1413020759144;
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 02:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k2sm9585286wjy.34.2014.10.11.02.45.57
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sat, 11 Oct 2014 02:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:45:31 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAO5-k+qo2D_7AAA9LMgbUwpvR5_6FyJKi+GyVeqKgrUVVc+nsw@mail.gmail.com> <5436E419.1040401@gmail.com> <5436E97E.90108@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5436E97E.90108@googlemail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1540429.Z7iEnRQYhN";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha256
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201410111045.41277.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 6fd66a0e-21fd-4a21-8be7-91b891fda498
X-Archives-Hash: fe973a11c88aba72611975d496785e1c
--nextPart1540429.Z7iEnRQYhN
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thursday 09 Oct 2014 21:01:02 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 09.10.2014 um 21:38 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > On 09/10/2014 19:44, Francisco Ares wrote:
> >> 2014-10-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com
> >>=20
> >> <mailto:michaelkintzios@gmail.com>>:
> >> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
> >> > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
> >> > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
> >> > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
> >> > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days
> >> > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though
> >> > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas)
> >> > >=20
> >> > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq
> >> > > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is
> >> > > doing?
> >> >=20
> >> > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently
> >> > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed.
> >> > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ;
> >> > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox.
> >> > My window manager is Fluxbox.
> >> =20
> >> I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> >> occasionally
> >> as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use WebKit as
> >> its browser engine instead of KHTML.
> >> =20
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Mick
> >>=20
> >> Hi,
> >>=20
> >> How did you manage to get WebKit instead of KHTML? On my version, I c=
an
> >> only see the last.
> >>=20
> >> Thanks, and Best Regards,
> >> Francisco
> >=20
> > I set this up so long ago I forget exactly how I did it. IIRC it's as
> > simple as
> >=20
> > emerge kde-misc/kwebkitpart
> > konqueror menu -> View -> View Mode
>=20
> last time I tried webkit it broke websites in interessting ways.
Yes, it is not a panacea. Some websites cause Konqueror to crash. It just=
=20
crashes less often than when I use KHTML. :-)
I thought I had USE=3Dwebkit enabled somewhere and that's what brought it i=
n,=20
but now I see that it isn't set:
[- ] webkit
kde-base/kget: Enable KdeWebkit browser plugin using=20
kde-misc/kwebkitpart
[- ] (4/4.12) 4.12.5 [gentoo]
[- ] (4/4.13) 4.13.3 [gentoo]
[- ] (4/4.14) 4.14.0 [gentoo]
[- ] (4/4.14) 4.14.1 [gentoo]
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart1540429.Z7iEnRQYhN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAABCAAGBQJUOPxFAAoJELAdA+zwE4Yeh24H/AiGRZ05C+kM46QsEb7A+pMf
j+Yn+WVqbwIPGFs0DY5H2Iw2CAEfMUwbWGw80KRb/2G5mHaC6kZOQmn0iCMU6EmM
LrTZgEtyTeU4jJYaaNDOkIYqtnWO/yS7hUKZpCKYDrha9WpLRmicpiOCEDwSm3nD
QyWU28/Fh2NWgx8nPTrtS+HiGOq2eIQE1IU7ICC0ZrcQn9D3MrUQG4F5+zy7y/5x
mQ5GrtRPOGwT4aX9QSNVOIGeWZgRbMGc2H0/eIHK6S5+U0U0JF+q2H/7l20e1khg
edm219iYxYrmeFZ6OLdl6JekRvFVf5wBI6GLEv4f35SJ/Yn0rdDIJzdLRF1X2JY=
=74b0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1540429.Z7iEnRQYhN--