From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159217-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B70F138247
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:33:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0156EE09D6;
Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:33:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DFA2E09C3
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:33:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l18so10425744wgh.29
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=8T7Dfpi32sfKJ/CKtKC/vwHzJDHEjsFZymL/zzFLhBs=;
b=b6VsWkCMh8CG3p4tJsLY5JVJsC7Ff6ZS56JqyZlrXbYs7J8FI4tpbcFIAoOy6TIIVs
OpQukPNCLYzTLkbspfZNc4ea9DD1hF5tl3vs0ShXfnRaVGbyq7kdxxU/Bno0brE/4Atx
RjXVPkvWO1+YFA+tO82GaB/sB6zPn+idOeRiEIEpRdHpjABOalIRcJtfQ4TPdB1bLHr8
tfQkq2mJDTgMC7cr+4eN/tDa12nRu1h1ShhC2VtnZFJP931+pd1TSkbBI4oLoa27lck9
trTNcg53OFPIW/rgGUvMty5/rQfltdXVcPBLxP/y75KgDF9vrKkNqlKfLelnzKqEbB+x
l5XQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.101.134 with SMTP id fg6mr16337102wib.9.1412717602049;
Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dc9sm16221542wib.5.2014.10.07.14.33.20
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:32:48 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAO5-k+qo2D_7AAA9LMgbUwpvR5_6FyJKi+GyVeqKgrUVVc+nsw@mail.gmail.com> <1429500.u2QV0yu7Q5@andromeda> <20141007211804.5c3d1d32@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20141007211804.5c3d1d32@digimed.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart5588174.L1rtRnKY4B";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha256
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201410072233.06236.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 66ef5ad5-226e-4908-8afd-a379c834f332
X-Archives-Hash: 78e5f4419cd27caa3666080c27b04f21
--nextPart5588174.L1rtRnKY4B
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 21:18:04 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:26:42 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> > > occasionally as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use
> > > WebKit as its browser engine instead of KHTML.
> >=20
> > Why not use Dolphin as file manager?
>=20
> Because neither it nor Krusader is anywhere near as flexible. I still
> consider the introduction of Dolphin to be a major backwards step of KDE4.
I agree with Neil. I can't really see what Dolphin offers that Konqueror=20
didn't already have. Of course, with KDE4 you *have* to install Dolphin to=
=20
get Konqueror to do what it always did. No point in me dissing KDE4 devs f=
or=20
they inspired executive decisions (pissing many of their existing user base=
=20
off and not really attracting any new punters along) because others have=20
already covered this admirably, but you get the gist.
=2D-=20
Regards,
Mick
--nextPart5588174.L1rtRnKY4B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAABCAAGBQJUNFwRAAoJELAdA+zwE4Yeh3oH/2zPAkMbOgldrLnGBJG3ycxc
a6p2CNqP2BUpEbxFoABl9sW5GTasNXf1zfKqz6Vusa1eMsh6y/H2BuH+UtZ6eGSP
i5i3wNd6oerhTKGimjaUyFr7mZvhKNE2bKyTzFacLU4/FJ31cIRiSo12NmJ+48kU
hxuY/t0zrUy4zFYHDdAs1sxEyfOLYfGg72t1DRX81gB5Sfv+ZQfYzwOqp6QWM2H6
Ertgsrp4fIET1qKwZCw8KH3tgj8x3/MKqHIZB0moMQijy9rWOiPw2HF5v7CdrJZL
9oVrwtkYistMV1WgQhcBQAE4qqSD3rrb+qHoLIOnkkhEvXncYdZdfw6uCX2pwj4=
=StW9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart5588174.L1rtRnKY4B--