From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525281388E3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 048D8E0A9E; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (mail-1.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3EF3E0A8B for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616952EA2E6 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:48:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e+flLaXszUev for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:48:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ca.inter.net (unknown [206.126.80.82]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DD6B12EA2A7 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:48:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ca.inter.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:48:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:48:33 -0400 From: Philip Webb To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5? Message-ID: <20141007144833.GA1020@ca.inter.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <543144E8.9090206@libertytrek.org> <54316546.7070407@libertytrek.org> <54317162.50508@gmail.com> <543178F3.20505@googlemail.com> <54317B9A.5080909@gmail.com> <09f663a3-d956-471d-8f4f-ed5126137a74@lists.xtsubasa.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09f663a3-d956-471d-8f4f-ed5126137a74@lists.xtsubasa.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Archives-Salt: 9acc36cb-8bc4-48f2-9990-9da7dc32bff8 X-Archives-Hash: 4cf4855bd053539d6890f44b7d709621 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote: > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months, >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium. >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas) > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing? I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently after it refused to accept every URL as malformed. Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ; I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox. My window manager is Fluxbox. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca