From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C0513838B for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38508E0AE3; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE476E0938 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:23:29 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqsGAIDvNVNFxIYB/2dsb2JhbABZgwY7w0yBFxd0giYBAQQ6HDMLIRMSDwUlN4d50hkXjwEWgw6BFAEDjz6JD4E0hS2Ja4Fqg0wh X-IPAS-Result: AqsGAIDvNVNFxIYB/2dsb2JhbABZgwY7w0yBFxd0giYBAQQ6HDMLIRMSDwUlN4d50hkXjwEWgw6BFAEDjz6JD4E0hS2Ja4Fqg0wh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="90901815" Received: from 69-196-134-1.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO waltdnes.org) ([69.196.134.1]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2014 20:23:28 -0400 Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:23:20 -0400 From: "Walter Dnes" Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:23:20 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ? Message-ID: <20140926002320.GB21773@waltdnes.org> References: <54245C36.50507@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Archives-Salt: 5a803237-b8c2-47d7-8f46-73a49a55a322 X-Archives-Hash: 12565718a68127cda061c383044c85fc On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:03:02PM +0000, James wrote > Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes: > > > > > Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev? > > > in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level > > with udev-208, from time before the .link support at all > > ah, back when ethernet defaulted to eth0 not "enp5s0" ? I buy machines with one ethernet interface. What I find particularly annoying is this doublespeak about calling it "predictable". Before the change, it was predicatbly "eth0". Now, it's different on every different model. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications