From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39AA13838B for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67F1FE08FF; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C99DE08BF for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XWQl4-003MDD-OL>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:07:58 +0200 Received: from dslb-188-103-188-186.188.103.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([188.103.188.186] helo=TranscendTheRubicon.alshain.ring0) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XWQl4-0038BL-K5>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:07:58 +0200 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:07:50 +0200 From: Hinnerk van Bruinehsen To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error Message-ID: <20140923140750.GC23337@TranscendTheRubicon.alshain.ring0> References: <20140923024941.GA2848@waltdnes.org> <20140923115204.GA23337@TranscendTheRubicon.alshain.ring0> <2770139.uQY8eekLN5@andromeda> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2770139.uQY8eekLN5@andromeda> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Originating-IP: 188.103.188.186 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-Archives-Salt: 08050240-ab18-4325-a8f4-a2e0e755335b X-Archives-Hash: a38fc8e596f52a809b1360adfa937bcc --p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:20PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: >=20 > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 08:47:31 AM Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen > >=20 > > wrote: > > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you > > > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one. > > > > > >... > > > > > > I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the stro= ng > > > version. > >=20 > > Ironically enough, your last sentence overflowed my parsing stack. :) > >=20 > > -- > > Rich >=20 > I am guessing: > " I think it is not unlikely that you don't want the strong version" >=20 > parses to: >=20 > " I think it is likely that you don't want the strong version " > or: " I think it is unlikely that you want the strong version" >=20 > ? Thanks for translating me! ;-) --p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUIX62AAoJEJwwOFaNFkYcZ4UIAKF1pIPMl/7H9f4RWOf6KGwu hVhFI027hMezxPXHkzha3rMc+1m46xTIu96+7SFctEhPqYu6c1nvsdqBhX+Gg6dy YmiDxDFIPFTnoic/fiDYqlWQMgzME6drD0Ci9ebDLGwN4ypSL2LrgNZJEC098lOV 0UvlxfCuhlSg5pDo+HeTDl6EQvgkgX/sbF5LiySzTZms2jvuSG8IaxhEju1T6b0P B2LRZpeqfiPllM0I7oTUjeSs6syhapoCWYj8SmRnUpvwWN7/t9falYygPt0Y4le9 ErnHrHBztSYYEomMdJPSDG7/Xq1Y5EmDCuHTMH7vCFtpz+EUZ763wHoRuDtBTsY= =NEC0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p2kqVDKq5asng8Dg--