From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-158514-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2D01387FD
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:21:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02D03E099C;
	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:21:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail119c7.megamailservers.com (mail104c7-2520.megamailservers.com [69.49.98.20])
	(using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E979E0986
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:21:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-POP-User: admin@sys-concept.com
X-VIP: 69.49.109.100
Received: from syscon7.localdomain (S01060050da7ae68c.ed.shawcable.net [68.149.90.13])
	by mail119c7.megamailservers.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s8A3LIWe019888
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 23:21:20 -0400
Received: by syscon7.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4CA29200257; Tue,  9 Sep 2014 21:21:23 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:21:23 -0600
From: Joseph <syscon780@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] can not compile / emerge
Message-ID: <20140910032123.GA12488@syscon7>
References: <20140909183638.GD23438@syscon7>
 <540FBEAA.2050906@fastmail.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <540FBEAA.2050906@fastmail.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.540FC3B0.006D,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules: 
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=b+2LvL2x c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=C3ZDv51cNVt4vJz/79I2xQ==:117
	a=C3ZDv51cNVt4vJz/79I2xQ==:17 a=SDcUNfBxAAAA:8 a=BDKbP5mgAAAA:8
	a=Unq3plm5DvEA:10 a=M1kyBYkWWGkA:10 a=k-d1zc9rZMQA:10 a=wdZCg-uQ71YA:10
	a=nDghuxUhq_wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8
	a=6rsQ3V5lXVFzpnEcxGQA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
X-Archives-Salt: 29b59fa5-132e-49ca-a24f-968387dc9940
X-Archives-Hash: f29db6be9eabb86efb21f44368238f57

On 09/10/14 03:59, Kerin Millar wrote:
>On 09/09/2014 19:36, Joseph wrote:
[snip]

>>
>> Running on my other system I get:
>> equery b libstdc++.so.6
>> * Searching for libstdc++.so.6 ... sys-devel/gcc-4.5.4
>> (/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.4/libstdc++.so.6 ->
>> libstdc++.so.6.0.14)
>>
>> env-update - doesn't work either
>>
>
>Check beneath /etc/env.d/ld.so.conf.d and ensure that there is a file
>defining the appropriate paths for your current version of gcc. Here's
>how it looks on my system:
>
>   # cd /etc/ld.so.conf.d
>   # ls
>   05binutils.conf  05gcc-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.conf
>   # cat 05gcc-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.conf
>   /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3/32
>   /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3
>
>Once you have made any necessary changes, run ldconfig.
>
>--Kerin

Thanks Kerin, for the pointer.
I think I have a bigger problem, and don't know how to fix it.

Yes, I have the same file /etc/ld.so.conf.d
# ls 
# 05gcc-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.conf
# cat 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3/32
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.3

However, those directories are empty (only one file):
# ls -al /usr/lib/
libbrcomplpr2.so

On my other working system this directory "/usr/lib/" contain about 2020 files.
What had happened?  

After emerging some files and system I was running command: fstrim -v / (as the disk is SSD).
Could it have something to do with the fact that these directories are empty?
-- 
Joseph