From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-156838-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A62613877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:40:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C09FEE09BB;
	Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:40:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6F5E09AE
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:40:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8])
	by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E92F1232A8
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:40:32 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:40:32 +0100
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: smartctrl drive error @60%
Message-ID: <20140628134032.48f92cab@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <53AEAD30.5060607@gmail.com>
References: <53AA050F.4070907@gmail.com>
	<53AAF0CB.4060902@gmail.com>
	<20140625170952.3f3250c8@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
	<201406251745.06064.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
	<20140625182940.5e6e4adf@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
	<53AB4A31.3030104@gmail.com>
	<lohlrt$l2p$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<53AEAD30.5060607@gmail.com>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1-42-g20d68d (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/.UalSGvOiW5cOxj9WqRVu6B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 3c8092b9-ba97-43a1-a5cb-76a3c89d966a
X-Archives-Hash: 6a2fbd51ac3d01886127645a7266cbb3

--Sig_/.UalSGvOiW5cOxj9WqRVu6B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 06:55:28 -0500, Dale wrote:

> It was more Murphy's law I was worried about.  ;-)=20

Hasn't that been deprecated in favour of Dale's Law?


--=20
Neil Bothwick

I thought the 10 commandments were multiple choice.

--Sig_/.UalSGvOiW5cOxj9WqRVu6B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlOut8AACgkQum4al0N1GQNtIQCguSdrGK/9UgaAY2bYA9DgEM6O
AQAAoNQvSGv69RwmjHWkg3GXELQEy5X3
=oT/T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/.UalSGvOiW5cOxj9WqRVu6B--