From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32F013877A for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09EE5E09C9; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC87FE09C0 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B6F1D232A8 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:37:11 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:37:11 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% Message-ID: <20140628093711.4d0aad2a@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201406280848.51796.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> References: <53AA050F.4070907@gmail.com> <201406271422.28115.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20140627215432.003491a9@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <201406280848.51796.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1-42-g20d68d (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/kFfxJU2Nf3NVsutVYMxoBoH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8d24cd13-7d7e-4e14-86f7-566958885be4 X-Archives-Hash: 269365d6dabedd07a3e2b4e237b94ba3 --Sig_/kFfxJU2Nf3NVsutVYMxoBoH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:48:40 +0100, Mick wrote: > > > I would think that your ISP providers in the US will be blocking > > > outgoing port 25 to stop compromised MSWindows machines spamming the > > > rest of us. If you use my suggestion there shouldn't be a > > > problem. =20 > >=20 > > It makes no difference whether you address it directly to your ISP > > address or via an alias. The ISP won't block port 25 connections to > > its own servers from its own customers, otherwise none of them could > > send email at all! =20 >=20 > In the US many big players are blocking outbound port 25 for their > customers as a blanket measure to control spam from botnets, e.g.: >=20 > http://www.verizon.com/Support/Residential/internet/highspeed/general+sup= port/top+questions/questionsone/124274.htm > If Dale uses the ssmtp.conf I sent he will be using a different port + > TLS encryption and should not have a problem. Yes, that makes sense. I thought you were referring to the aliases part of the config. Using TLS or a different port if that's what the ISP needs is perfectly logical. --=20 Neil Bothwick Bus: (n.) a connector you plug money into, something like a slot machine. --Sig_/kFfxJU2Nf3NVsutVYMxoBoH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOufrcACgkQum4al0N1GQNTsgCffZjVYIuc4nrLB6TLnls+JR05 iPsAnja4pJ16Asxym9G6W+jfJCaMsnY8 =bKNp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/kFfxJU2Nf3NVsutVYMxoBoH--