From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4006113877A for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FC6DE09E9; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552FAE0978 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so2760425wgg.32 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:17:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=Y8UMChVOHIhOyfKuTb0PyT7iLNwXSEuULTuOUkaV/pY=; b=iENAjgy5OeuV0nDfzGfYaufxMVaJBwEKNzIXv4gV6DMpuDsj0X6yQHyoqEkIs3bc7O L6mwJf7K5PXteUJdFdut3xRa2CI9Ub5CR5Jh/nM373QMpfUgcfJmKhV0zpBQAL5bIGyq r8NJ/ctYjxnk77ysTF9eL9ygjVjtHXwBkrPMFifWpnVZ6MeTw+YvTjhXzOJADB7rhyO/ iHKX9zVJy4TpvrrboQIlNe/FSJmKv/E8Dcgcg9JxNtbh0y/CHpiLbyUya7fDy9wxTsIo 0t7kNQm7NnpqB7V7s3lcxqUT63OfSTjhRJnvXqyZ1EZRQkf4aaITK3jz0PtY/sYrRxMX oROQ== X-Received: by 10.194.77.177 with SMTP id t17mr12263623wjw.55.1403731077879; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dj2sm57860309wib.11.2014.06.25.14.17.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: firefox profile opens my web-page in https Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:17:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.21-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20140622215240.GC9332@syscon7> <201406251830.56252.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20140625185451.GF29677@syscon7> In-Reply-To: <20140625185451.GF29677@syscon7> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart17550709.Hes5DcndDR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201406252217.35584.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: e9b3dcb8-92a0-44cc-b5ba-9c8a0400baeb X-Archives-Hash: ae80f421a95b5638b0b6873c3d9da062 --nextPart17550709.Hes5DcndDR Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 25 Jun 2014 19:54:51 Joseph wrote: > On 06/25/14 18:30, Mick wrote: > >On Wednesday 25 Jun 2014 17:42:01 Joseph wrote: > >> On 06/24/14 17:25, walt wrote: > >> >On 06/24/2014 08:25 AM, Joseph wrote: > >> >> On 06/23/14 18:08, Mick wrote: > >> >>> On Sunday 22 Jun 2014 22:52:40 Joseph wrote: > >> >>>> I run a server and have two firefox profiles. > >> >>>> I have ssl enabled. > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>> When I open one profile I it opens my web-page in "https" instead > >> >>>> of "http" When I open another profile it open my webpage in http > >> >>>>=20 > >> >>>> Why is first profile forcing my opening my servers page in https > >> >>>> mode? > >> >>>=20 > >> >>> Has one profile cached and different protocol+URL in the address > >> >>> bar, than the other? > >> >>>=20 > >> >>> Does this persist if you clear the history of the profile? > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Mick > >> >>=20 > >> >> No, it makes no difference. I cleared history and cache. > >> >> It still tries to open my server page as https instead of http. > >> > > >> >Different profiles can have different firefox add-ons enabled. Might > >> >be worth comparing the list of add-ons in each profile. > >> > > >> >You can also run firefox -safe-mode to disable extensions and see if = it > >> >makes any difference. > >>=20 > >> I don't have any plug-in installed; so I'm puzzled by this behavior. > > > >Do your settings for session-cookies differ between the two profiles? > > > >Otherwise I'm running out of ideas. >=20 > Cookies are the same on both profiles "allow for session" > I'm running out of ideas as well. Logically, the server gets a 'GET / HTTP/1.1' request from the client and=20 responds to it in the same way, irrespective of the client. If you are=20 running some clever authentication and javascript/php on the server, then t= he=20 request could be tested for the browser capabilities and serve different pa= ge=20 content accordingly. Do you see a difference in the initial exchange of: GET / HTTP/1.1 --> HTTP/1.1 200 OK <-- when you use 'tcpflow -c -i eth0' between the two profiles? Note if the browser starts an TLS negotiation then all the content will be= =20 encrypted. Otherwise you should be able to see what attributes it sends to= =20 the server, e.g. Accept:=20 text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=3D0.9,image/webp,*/*;q=3D= 0.8 and what the server responds in each case. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart17550709.Hes5DcndDR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABCAAGBQJTqzxvAAoJELAdA+zwE4Yedu8H/3uxvcAnKWw077QyZ1c1jQ0f gZqpbjYDayH+mQJCAR0cct6mBIONgHubOLMT9xZOU5kjMUyUsHBEYhwyLwSnmVqf mQp805Ztc0U6WxItHZso+a8OnCWK3PTLvU0s0+2qxla4MF6rIJavDMsQTCYd95EC GS4peJHxdVDSvnbI3nTJdajoK2G1kNjQX04hJgoWMuzS48HHHTOLLVUt7Km8dOL0 /LhXT703XGBvcvogELLcvQyPm0NV1ssZQaQ7Id8OJN/yRJs5sEfukzG1Y+8dRaDz 0W+ZHSdROQBJ6ZGUvphcEzlODoNl3I6vNSZGijzWwCLy/QNesT5ftA8imKMKMnM= =6h5c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart17550709.Hes5DcndDR--