On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 08:11:31 -0400 Dutch Ingraham wrote: > [nomerge ] mate-base/mate-1.6.0::mate-overlay You are still using the MATE overlay, which wasn't synced up with the latest changes; make layman sync, but if you want to be really sure just remove the overlay from layman and use MATE from the Portage tree. > [ebuild N #] mate-base/mate-session-manager-1.6.1-r1::mate-overlay > [ebuild N ] sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 Don't mask MATE, it causes more blockers; mate-base/mate requires it. As you can see above, your old checkout of the MATE overlay pulls in sys-power/upower; the MATE in the portage tree doesn't do this as it allows upower-pm-utils to satisfy this, I think this has also been fixed up in the MATE overlay recently which a sync could solve. > [blocks B ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration > ("sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration" is blocking sys-fs/udev-212-r1) > [blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd ("sys-apps/systemd" is blocking > sys-fs/udev-212-r1) > [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking > sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4, sys-apps/systemd-212-r5) Fixing what was said above, for MATE (maybe XFCE too), will fix it ... > (sys-apps/systemd-212-r5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > pulled in by > >=sys-apps/systemd-200 required by > (sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) ... as well as this; this last thing points out that something is still pulling in upower, that's due to the old MATE overlay checkout. The MATE overlay plans to retire itself in less than a week from now. https://github.com/Sabayon/mate-overlay/issues/76 If you need help with switching to MATE in the Portage tree, feel free to let me know; this migration is supposed to go very fluent, so, removing the overlay from layman should work out well. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D