From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005911381FA for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BA67E0AC1; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F19E0A99 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hactar.digimed.co.uk (hactar.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.3]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90AA022E02 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:56:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:56:24 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? Message-ID: <20140602115624.214cbdbe@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <538C51A0.8050903@gmail.com> References: <538B1D0A.9070405@libertytrek.org> <538B66A1.6070106@googlemail.com> <538C344E.6050809@gmail.com> <538C42D3.6050205@googlemail.com> <20140602103422.39856e78@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <538C485F.5070901@gmail.com> <538C4C9A.5080107@gmail.com> <538C51A0.8050903@gmail.com> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.0-33-ge7dc27 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/zFvQcxL=R=+RMc7wg4leoEm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: cdf2bc21-f72e-4a5b-8767-239d8b839df7 X-Archives-Hash: 7cad0ee4f3e6ad5e2fa8db3a1073d2ea --Sig_/zFvQcxL=R=+RMc7wg4leoEm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:27:44 -0500, Dale wrote: > The second option does sound what I am looking for. Basically, if I log > out but leave my computer on, leave home, some crook/NSA type breaks in > and tries to access something or steals my whole puter, they would just > get garbage for data. That seems to fit the second option best.=20 If they steal your computer they will have to power it off, unless you are kind enough to leave them a large enough UPS to steal along with it, so any encryption will be equally effective. --=20 Neil Bothwick Capt'n! The spellchecker kinna take this abuse! --Sig_/zFvQcxL=R=+RMc7wg4leoEm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOMWFgACgkQum4al0N1GQPIQACfbsaiX3xCmgSHNOuErlf2c+Zl x+oAnR+AVZq+X6sAR3aKTi8GGGiDjA7q =W7Tz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zFvQcxL=R=+RMc7wg4leoEm--