From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887311381FA for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 20:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC0CDE0AF7; Fri, 16 May 2014 20:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D9CE0AD8 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 20:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marcec ([77.22.138.176]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M70HF-1WxpiI0MAH-00wlaA for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 22:43:07 +0200 Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:43:01 +0200 From: Marc Joliet To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] experience thus far (was: planned btrfs conversion: questions) Message-ID: <20140516224301.724ab45b@marcec> In-Reply-To: <20140516221558.19e69a5b@marcec> References: <20140506121832.678ae781@marcec> <20140516221558.19e69a5b@marcec> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/wLBV_q9+OBApZPWvpA6WEyj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:amanGFcuX3GUIqmgYQCo9qoyWIMsGGJTcuR/jkCx7AIFSLAky+5 RssflnWLggmDm0hadYDORsq8agbtKgew5OGvMO34H+pZViKviUzb3fi2oN6l5EPbtzfn53z ThpD6I49cv4ojwSuThl6g7XvceLmTFqklgi1zeSnSxFShFxYvmvVU8nh4fpF2IfQ5PJGMwI Z5DVWzhvfzeDtUWdj3xrg== X-Archives-Salt: 191cd286-4bd8-48d2-a422-d331e1ea57ac X-Archives-Hash: 00a73fef146aa631b6af0dda5481c5d6 --Sig_/wLBV_q9+OBApZPWvpA6WEyj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Fri, 16 May 2014 22:15:58 +0200 schrieb Marc Joliet : [...] > The one thing that I can tell from reading the past two weeks of the btrf= s ML > is that the 3.15 Linux kernel series will contain lots of bug fixes (for > example in balancing, error handling, and send/receive), and that I will = want > to use that sooner rather than later. Of course, the severity of the prob= lems > varies, and a lot are triggered under odd, or at least uncommon, circumst= ances. > Still, its worth paying attention to. [...] Sorry, obviously I didn't mean 3.15, which had its first RC in April, but 3.16 (and later, depending on when the patches get merged), though 3.15 will most likely also have lots of bug fixes. --=20 Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup --Sig_/wLBV_q9+OBApZPWvpA6WEyj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTdnhZAAoJEL/Q5oYsiHj01eoQAI88WR8/QllEGY2cZOBxzdpU O23w5abRtPDQydIZt5aoVfLAHKSVlNkv9beT/gtUmMVHFL+d03VUgpR7U9xIhZp7 jWZemcc+AfE2p8ueFGrBl6uWUh582htz7KR56ZTpZ5hzpZ6QM4t+cDWYXFRvUBCW ZjqJS+MMnkgWkWbJjSWq22L1ySfeMjiTE46KHD3MKv1oSqmC4OWQ1p2jqTIloZyQ OURF9ysV4p82LDEUo5DtefwWUSysEXkjM6gAlgfYmsDOgVGqZmY1mXDJuWbvIw7k V9M1NigkLN058tLNMBAfWHzxwjdoEq7eBaesTZLkDvV+qKDjey6GsCnYjA54CuOd wIXmc/cjXSO4VzeBZjsByQYbzcK28F96Voabft2L73NYDRpphyoR9OXgA34l48GQ Jb8z8bk9+ql3z7l/0vweGy6NmoHF+14bAY9q4eSER8bDByFL5VmRy0y8Z9tqawHW C0N4+PX5QGbVXKz/dIB3Aqr0GUGXl7vwEtFQuZjrFMc7tEq1fe3glwFdzeAoNVQa VTqkvrhpj69LGlByKUcbg+88K6BjvrX3kLM4I9mzDalPWpKKVovefLAz+bHOmP18 +a7QOGIRgp9MgVbrzg28uzusHaAVhDoKZYF7cdEokRhfjVqvueIHBAwYy+aDYpyz +KQDwH2xC8rKsFHYS97k =ddsI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wLBV_q9+OBApZPWvpA6WEyj--