From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFDC1391DB for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35D13E0B89; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be (andre.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A04BE0B77 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([94.226.55.127]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id gcG31n00C2khLEN01cG3d0; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:16:03 +0100 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:15:49 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Debian just voted in systemd for default init system in jessie Message-ID: <20140322131549.3c828d30@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <67F46EB2-2C55-414E-9BA1-806E04592268@iki.fi> References: <53075C77.5040505@libertytrek.org> <530767B0.6000607@libertytrek.org> <20140320211402.48a597f9@gentoo.org> <532B5CBE.8010105@libertytrek.org> <20140321121328.23425250@gentoo.org> <20140321122709.4219538d@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20140321134902.6eaba663@gentoo.org> <20140321142948.59ce3f62@gentoo.org> <20140321215707.GA16478@waltdnes.org> <532CBE8F.7080506@gmail.com> <20140322004640.7d57eff6@gentoo.org> <532D674D.1020007@gmail.com> <67F46EB2-2C55-414E-9BA1-806E04592268@iki.fi> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ff96941e-24f0-4737-909f-7d78b1f7e29e X-Archives-Hash: 60c2a4ddb429d303bd333405777eea30 On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 12:57:40 +0200 Matti Nykyri wrote: > I agree. I think it is arrogant to disturb lots of people that have > done nothing to deserve it. People should be let to choose them self > what they wanna do with their lives. If they wish to disengage some > conversation, let them. Don't send them spam. spam is send to a large number of recipients; I don't see how what is discussing here is doing that, apart from extending this discussion. It's not arrogant; it's a technical difference, which sets up different approaches. That's why developers are requested to follow the etiquette. > The ones who wish to participate will stay on the list and the ones > seeking for an answer can browse the archives. People that participate maybe are on the list and the ones seeking for an answer might browse the archives. > Please respect other people. Here's something that works for the both of us: Request someone to not CC you in a follow-up mail when you catch them do it, they'll respect that; that's a guarantee that we can be certain that you are subscribed. That way; you respect that I want to spent my time to be guaranteed to be useful, I respect that you don't want to be CC-ed in follow-up mails. Similarly; if someone is off-list; it takes a single mail to keep me from sending additional mails. As it clarifies a disengagement; that unsubscribing is meant to be a disengagement, I can't find that rule... -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D