From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918A61391DB for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39D22E0DFC; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be (baptiste.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D67E0DDB for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([94.226.55.127]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id gFl81n0062khLEN01Fl8sR; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:45:08 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:44:56 +0100 From: Tom Wijsman To: microcai@fedoraproject.org Cc: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.18 build problem Message-ID: <20140321164456.374c6261@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4af8c988-23df-4926-b61a-d6dd1fecc1a7 X-Archives-Hash: 8b8ae65081996521b41d0833d6ab24bb On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:43:27 +0800 microcai wrote: > I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils > 2.23 2.24. or -9999 live version, I got ld internal error in > x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and > glibc-2.19 . > > Don't know why . The google bring me a old bug report about > x86_64_relocation internal error when used conjunction with > IFUNC, but that doesn't seems to be related with mine problem. > > When I first try to update glibc to 2.18, it's fine. but then the > attempt to update glibc to 2.18-r1 failed with ld internal > error. This error remains with glibc-2.16-r2 and glibc-2.19, > regardless of binutils version. > > Does anyone have had the same problem? > Can you file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org such that the maintainers are aware of this? That is, only if it is still reproducible today. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D