From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31CE1392EF for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 891ACE0B00; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DEEE09B3 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73B4222FB1 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:14:04 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:14:03 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MD5SUM Message-ID: <20140314091403.34b25473@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1536011394773533@web20j.yandex.ru> References: <1536011394773533@web20j.yandex.ru> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3-37-gdf4408 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/hapKr6MCNXFjk9bO86PNnKi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d60766b0-b770-4b05-a6dc-8a438d80cf64 X-Archives-Hash: 6921457671708667bfd658f700c94860 --Sig_/hapKr6MCNXFjk9bO86PNnKi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:05:33 +0800, Guido Budack wrote: > nice on but doesn't tell me why the md5sum isn't correct... > Usually I don't check the sums if it isn't 'critical' stuff or an OS. > So after I checked the other sources and files I figured out that ALL > md5sums are incorrect but the file-sizes aren't. In that case either > the media is corrupted or my local os (Ubunto). The latter one I > couldn't explain because its all genuine and updated almost on a daily > basis... Hardware fault? > Don't know, may be I stick to my debian and let it just be... > However, thanks for your efforts. If you're going to give up on something as simple as this, maybe Gentoo isn't for you anyway :( --=20 Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 30: Business ethics --Sig_/hapKr6MCNXFjk9bO86PNnKi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlMiyFsACgkQum4al0N1GQM8JQCgzGoOOrSjS2qZGhAdCeV+YhgG LAUAoK1I53T35X4fXll6iTTFIqIXmFQq =irYY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/hapKr6MCNXFjk9bO86PNnKi--