On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:52:33 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2014-02-17 12:52 PM, Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And this is a very, very bad idea. Looks like you don't know matter at
> > all: to begin with kdbus protocol is NOT compatible dbus and special
> > converter daemon will be needed to enable dbus to talk to kdbus. The
> > whole kdbus technology is very questionable itself (and was
> > forcefully pushed by RH devs), anyway it is possible to disable this
> > stuff in kernel and guess what will be done on my systems.
> 
> Forcefully? Are you saying that *anyone* can *force* Linus to put 
> something into the kernel?

OK, my choice of words was not appropriate. I mean that not every
kernel dev is happy that kdbus is in the kernel now.

> I'd also really, *really* like to hear a *recent* opinion from Linus on 
> systemd...

Judging from his previous opinions this one is unlikely to be systemd-
friendly.

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko