From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57E8138A1F for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09A24E0B35; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D035FE0B29 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l18so1488350wgh.5 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:13:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=lSPRvxdMLkHIPL7KRsCyqaL4sVTENsgg+QjGEvAndL4=; b=Yh+FN47YVReH6uDi7efs4awxJp7ScZFVy/8+SOKSjOwbuOUPex9xyDaolRpO659iaf utnZAcQb+o//J9X9zWJ9MvhZ5wZqY4/skI6Plzwp2xg7ptYAjHiJHW58ep5uodggRNCr ykkVVos7ECOCY/Bs/+OHRtrw/7Rtens6gsxoJtRjY8lSjCQDmQQwHNm6DvxQfEPM7srM ZK5wHEZXrMYYcMYuR/v7oM+LipFRDTnI0slXBSATiSDJl6aFHIQ7P5nyII16WQlorPJU 1dnLmG8ZKcfQacv9nu0UmytS8BoQTK0JoJfmu43pNuRrLhkyvnn3bXJCyGZ83s/5XtjM fDYA== X-Received: by 10.194.219.132 with SMTP id po4mr14785325wjc.7.1391195634564; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm21605785wjq.0.2014.01.31.11.13.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:13:53 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:13:21 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.17-gentoo; KDE/4.11.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <52E5543B.4070808@gmail.com> <20140131230305.1b4ee153af223fd43f541fac@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140131230305.1b4ee153af223fd43f541fac@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1833928.xntPdjeCNc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401311913.45133.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: baaaba7b-5d90-4af1-a555-3d75b64b0e16 X-Archives-Hash: 8e69a0adbbd7df3aee7874a7e1427789 --nextPart1833928.xntPdjeCNc Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 31 Jan 2014 19:03:05 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:30:19 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > It comes from watching what happens at the end of running emerge, don't > > read any more into it than that. Especially not optimism, I think you > > might be projecting your own frustrations. > >=20 > > A couple of years ago I used to have to manually resolve blockers about > > one world update in two. It started becoming a huge PITA especially as > > the deps are usually easy to solve - if I can look at the screen for a > > few seconds and figure it out, then software can do the same in > > milliseconds. Recent portages now do this properly when viewed from a > > results-only perspective. > >=20 > > On my machines, that is what I see happening. That is the ONLY set of > > FACTS I have to work on; you may have more. > >=20 > > I'm willing to give up 4 minutes while emerge runs so I don't have to > > spend many more minutes right afterwards doing manually the very shit > > that software is very good at. Whether portage is a complete pile of > > dogshit software or not is beside the point. Even if it is, my 4 minutes > > still buys me lots >=20 > 4 minutes are expendable but... on Atom N270 (my laptop) emerge > -DNuav world takes 40 (yes, forty) minutes to build dependency tree > with sqlite cache enabled and 60 minutes without sqlite. System was > pretty old (not updated aside from GLSA updates for a year). And this > 40 minutes repeated many times since USE flag clashes and dependency > resolution failures. So I spent may day, damn whole day(!) for the > sake to just start compiling (distcc is my friend here). Out of interest what fs are you running portage on? I changed an old box f= rom=20 reiserfs to ext4 and couldn't believe the speed up I got. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1833928.xntPdjeCNc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJS6/XpAAoJELAdA+zwE4Yeyq0IALN1v36nNXL3Qja4TyXwDFI6 HxtsLz/CBcphEyYbOREYMZ/XA6sBIFcm2UijOXBrnTzGSrMzm+JaP30SoqtOKLhe OV4BJIkGkHCdDxSGsOTGzYobzOHmi/IABcljl2Uf35Sm6+GNVIyFaiZ18UUWs1XE 7kpdk98UXXXWiLgjHCPvgSQ1t4jcKrfNpeZ1kxYddmpHBlt1E1MaNQXqH/fwwVCf ft41xiVIIbOxlXJxFdXpxdXghxLbBzDoAbTuDkEAHALVa0ibdhCcy/racnwonZ2g nwnntFyDl+7fblorjx1BHtdXgloFFnECYuI8pylgCddjChfURQ31BDUWJcFjoJM= =mUhA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1833928.xntPdjeCNc--