From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AE5138A1F for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51E19E0CE3; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221E9E0AC0 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 89CFB212AB for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:48:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:48:37 +0000 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably Message-ID: <20140127214837.47278679@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <52E665B6.9030301@gentoo.org> References: <20140126162426.7a6d1f30@falcon.eroen.eu> <52E54920.5010207@gmail.com> <52E54E34.7080709@gentoo.org> <52E64A27.9090105@libertytrek.org> <52E659F1.1090508@gmail.com> <52E665B6.9030301@gentoo.org> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3-11-g845d06 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/UmpnG/RgD7_bTwGrR7L.GAB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 49787dea-ade7-4d0e-a80b-f46f611fc966 X-Archives-Hash: e323a63c28ce02c3b5054d677ac79685 --Sig_/UmpnG/RgD7_bTwGrR7L.GAB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:57:10 +0100, hasufell wrote: > If it's about performance (in the sense of speed), then paludis is > worse, because dependency calculation is more complex/complete there. That makes no sense at all. Paludis is written in a different language using different algorithms. It's not about the amount of work it does so much as how efficiently it does it. --=20 Neil Bothwick Earlier, I didn't have time to finish anything. This time I w --Sig_/UmpnG/RgD7_bTwGrR7L.GAB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLm1DUACgkQum4al0N1GQNGDwCfRvW8dJv68a5wPLI1wzyiCFTl IJoAoNV+32IHEY24bwyhzES8PwPvQCkw =FObN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/UmpnG/RgD7_bTwGrR7L.GAB--