From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-153401-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2DD138A1F
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:27:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 456B2E0C44;
	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:27:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257A4E0C2A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:27:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8])
	by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EDDF321D37
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:27:14 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:27:05 +0000
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably
Message-ID: <20140127092705.226adcd9@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20140126204419.GA26880@badass.gateway.2wire.net>
References: <lc36fi$ec7$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20140126162426.7a6d1f30@falcon.eroen.eu>
	<52E54920.5010207@gmail.com>
	<52E54E34.7080709@gentoo.org>
	<52E5543B.4070808@gmail.com>
	<52E556F0.3040908@gentoo.org>
	<52E56060.9070407@gmail.com>
	<20140126204419.GA26880@badass.gateway.2wire.net>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3-11-g845d06 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/SGei=wHx2fU96thvSVajXxs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 3363c4af-1276-44b9-b53a-54f9a39c8e11
X-Archives-Hash: 074f9fc665bc340d7d63e9fe0f802d45

--Sig_/SGei=wHx2fU96thvSVajXxs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:44:19 -0800, ny6p01@gmail.com wrote:

> It doesn't hurt that the webspace is
> filled with people like yourself who have hands on knowledge about how
> to do stuff, and are willing to share it with others minus the 'tude'
> you see elsewhere.=20

Now you really have insulted Alan :)


--=20
Neil Bothwick

OPERATOR ERROR: Nyah, Nyah, Nyah, Nyah, Nyah!

--Sig_/SGei=wHx2fU96thvSVajXxs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlLmJnEACgkQum4al0N1GQMCcACdEkvILsadOLa0j0Nt6f5WNS4C
u1oAn3lzgdLd4lnXh6DTdWnx/NMJOsdY
=fFAt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/SGei=wHx2fU96thvSVajXxs--