From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15236138247 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAD64E0B07; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B913FE0AF2 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 20:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q58so4061125wes.3 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=JTL086+Co52sQgUf98IhCjkLBH56RinrImkJVQNAznA=; b=RYzI8ilCqKNA/s/vwfeVMg+VDgLxaPM4iCO6QBuPM9rDzZPIQuabQ1siYu1S39sCA1 KNoC2T9TW9mKiskZlUNxQdlt89RIGM63+JkxfbkrBRHqhVJUc2wYAw3+/9n4l0cFmXb6 MsGTp+RdKrT+fY25GT5gfKgYbFttnudVTjfIfNYznUBmCntVL0LSuaX8K9PuqWdOnTms wyj8RpbloAfqyvq0pEpvhpaFS2aJdpGLokNck8NA30o3DvvMpmaF80mO6HS6TfQ3zTg3 EAxxCw2bEacNMexyLn89siOaJi+KsBUfdAtBh3R3JQ6HrkwWuIQiYZVecIE+kw73BKHg SBZQ== X-Received: by 10.194.239.40 with SMTP id vp8mr8449077wjc.45.1383682481690; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fu1sm17969795wib.8.2013.11.05.12.14.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:40 -0800 (PST) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: resolving blocked packages [media-video/ffmpeg-1.2:0] Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:05:53 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.17-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <526D4879.8030704@gmail.com> <20131105004108.GI22282@server> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1479656.mkRl6ogFbl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201311050806.06303.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 35e271e2-71fe-4b49-8080-62c2cc799ba5 X-Archives-Hash: 0b495784c64fe34873f21f1688a7c9e9 --nextPart1479656.mkRl6ogFbl Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 05 Nov 2013 06:15:56 Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote: > On 2013-11-05, Bruce Hill wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:43:07PM +0000, Mick wrote: > >> On Monday 04 Nov 2013 19:51:32 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> > On 11/03/2013 02:27 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > >> > > For starters, you should probably merge package.keywords into > >> > > package.accept_keywords; the latter is the "new" standard name, > >> > > though Portage will likely support the old names for a while. Just > >> > > a heads-up on that. > >> >=20 > >> > Thanks for a heads-up. I did as you suggested. > >>=20 > >> Is there going to be a portage news article on this, or did I miss it? > >=20 > > It wasn't two or three years ago... > >=20 > > mingdao@server ~ $ eselect news read 5 > > 2012-09-09-make.conf-and-make.profile-move > >=20 > > Title make.conf and make.profile move > > Author Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > > Posted 2012-09-09 > > Revision 1 > >=20 > > Starting next week, new stages will have make.conf and make.profile > > moved from /etc to /etc/portage. This is a change in the installation > > defaults, that will only affect new installs so it doesn't affect > > current systems. > >=20 > > Current users don't need to do anything. But if you want to follow the > > preferred location, you may want to take the chance to move the files > > in your system(s) to the new location. >=20 > But that's about make.conf, not about package.keywords. Right and I created two symlinks to make sure that at least *I* can still f= ind=20 these files without having to fight against muscle memory. I'm just checki= ng=20 if I need to create some more. BTW, I am running mostly stable here, with = the=20 odd testing version thrown in for cheap thrills. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1479656.mkRl6ogFbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSeKbuAAoJELAdA+zwE4YeC6sH/jAwSuGlGg+Nrz7RyFzqtX/K 9SGcNoB95j1xZuXEbJlXO9akaaOqzLavFfR7bAOXayf6/uTRp/Czh2tpDS+gOkNQ gJd74ZtN2fYW3ePQ1dA+Rmwh/fIIhzK1aTT/Q7LqPaVt8e1PwsHaxp5oBb8aguym AbZ37AL2xZhlgVUnruGRCfIMJmSjvAeKV/3YqleuR4DgdMT8X+nylyVGMe81yogY WnASjkBscvzfkgM3KpGjaFNlHNcTlKlD5EdLuZtxVMJBhVftOQRZPdLegMUGVskt bBEB6ocyHLk3aqc85iHwfkHHStpBKhap0xCUUfAojUNEzdhC85IEaDGGPVpRGcY= =JYX7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1479656.mkRl6ogFbl--