From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAC91381F3 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83255E0B5E; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BBCBE0AC4 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([84.184.180.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWwp6-1VB9Sa2zlk-00Vx07 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:40:28 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:40:27 +0200 From: Frank Steinmetzger To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom Message-ID: <20131021164026.GK2497@nukleus.Speedport_W723_V_Typ_A_1_00_098> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20131021160911.cc963516c18d659b56252e97@web.de> <20131021151530.GI2497@nukleus.Speedport_W723_V_Typ_A_1_00_098> <20131021180958.c5011b4e09092da0738baa21@web.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sl5MdczEF/OU2Miu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131021180958.c5011b4e09092da0738baa21@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15, Gentoo 1.5.21-r12) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Mbw8RicNCvvnY2D4VhMqiBBHMrN3yy3jDjV+L0YeCzkBCT9qP/6 bDiVtbs8pfmuLPy2quMk6P95LhLW1WLFSPP6uS1i9ZrGyv6RAJ1DOSJJJJ/Ifo4UZltDtwR Zm/qAXn7xdzcm/PTOIEnYvWc5K6YHi0gIYgCWck7Y9XdNFCO1rRzDtQ9v9c7cHNhfeZnGK8 2fAzktfVcHu3gB6id+XYg== X-Archives-Salt: 8f003fbd-c36c-4334-8a7e-c632de6c5ac0 X-Archives-Hash: 9f8d611270537fd0197a4edbafd199f6 --sl5MdczEF/OU2Miu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:15:30 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger > wrote: >=20 > > Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My netbook ran OK > > with 1 GB, but was very limited, especially once Firefox was loaded. > > 2 GB should be the minimum if you use a big desktop. >=20 > No its only 1 GB. I use XFCE4 and never has use more as 800 MB so what > i see with htop.=20 Well, with XFCE it should be enough, though having a lot of free RAM means more capacity for the filesystem cache to speed up reads. But the way you decribe the sluggishness, it must be more than read times. Hm... you could compare CPU performance... simple examples are the 7zip benchmark (`7z b`) or of course compiling a bigger package like gcc. > > What about HDD throughput? (test it with hdparm -t /dev/sda) >=20 > [18:05:44][ Akku: 29% ][root@gentoomobile:~]# hdparm -t /dev/sda > /dev/sda: > Timing buffered disk reads: 242 MB in 3.02 seconds =3D 80.25 MB/sec That looks normal, my Pro laptop from 6 years ago reaches around 75 MB/s, as does my netbook (Atom N450). --=20 Gru=C3=9F | Greetings | Qapla=E2=80=99 Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook servi= ce. Please notify me if you did not receive this message. --sl5MdczEF/OU2Miu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJlWPoACgkQGafpl66MV0xLigCgkrQbYkR3rWbet7YOWevRu2s2 rHgAn38dCVfQAlbcdfjGypSd/kmjqOWG =RGhy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sl5MdczEF/OU2Miu--