From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287291381F3 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11EF6E09BE; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C62E09AD for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id z12so4432986wgg.24 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 10:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=FeQtyRD7rFss35pKxyW3nDwiszLHy6cW2dxognBJm2k=; b=prUzvKkyWh/hM0WBcBpscSs8ngz6XOR0fMuDW3cNbMO8sTsw3V8HegGIxkDq8/yrMn DrQVS1Jkw3J6AGuHZB2CycP9Ao4Sohk2atlDdTy9rpimTGnopF+syCZ1g9sS61jnAlHm z/a5Svy5/rxk+yLgMpAejDHELErk40ISMq8vgaDR1a8EPfJHjB8gojIOnJd64blqOe5B JxUeCriL8eIBdmX53j/WC37+lTNvu73uLDn+9rytmVWLPqgs0aQ/t7lxZNaYd2d/cTZ8 AKeQiCcSLwApaTUakQ8kvzfA/P0lBB0ZagTkgMhA6dIzt/Au/xJMIhxhBLd9/+UVhhfy vF0Q== X-Received: by 10.180.189.205 with SMTP id gk13mr11392275wic.12.1381685472553; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 10:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm15052016wia.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Oct 2013 10:31:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Network failed and weird error message Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:31:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <524EE833.8030905@gmail.com> <5251AE0B.4050407@gmail.com> <525A9177.50305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <525A9177.50305@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1505072.5guMhp2qJe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201310131831.09468.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: f92eb0c8-34f6-4571-a2d8-0f825841d76a X-Archives-Hash: baff341fd1c4168a3b743a997458b6c8 --nextPart1505072.5guMhp2qJe Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 13:26:31 Dale wrote: > Dale wrote: > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Basically, it looks like you have a once-off event. > >>=20 > >> Until it happens again, very little you can do wrt troubleshooting > >=20 > > I agree. It ran for days with no problems that I saw. Sure is weird > > tho. I just wonder if something outside the puter happened and > > triggered something. Who knows. > >=20 > > Dale > >=20 > > :-) :-) >=20 > Still no fix on the error message. Maybe it is hardware and related to > this? I started having issues with the network again. This time, it > wasn't just browsers. It would be other stuff like Pidgin and such. > Generally restarting the network corrected the problem, after restarting > the other programs too since they would hang up. Anyway, I got tired of > this so I pulled a ethernet card from my junk drawer, pulled some hair > out trying to find the dmfe driver in the kernel and got it working. > Since moving away from the ethernet that is built into the mobo and to > this card, not a issue yet. I have not had a single hiccup. So, as > with my last rig, the ethernet port on the mobo just start to suck after > a while it seems. :/ >=20 > Now I just wish I could figure out this other USB issue. I suspect it > could be a hardware issue. I may have to upgrade my rig after all and I > don't really want to do that and may not be able to right away. >=20 > Memory question. The mobo I have uses this: "Support for DDR3 > 1666(OC)/1333/1066 MHz memory modules" I have the 1666 on here. It was > what was on sale. :-D The new mobo calls for this: "DDR3 > 2000(OC)/1866/1600/1333/1066" Are the two compatible? Both are DDR3. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > Dale >=20 > :-) :-) They are, although the new MoBo memory can be overclocked higher. Bear in= =20 mind that some MoBos will complain if they are not fitted with identical=20 memory modules. Somehow I happen to come across them each time ... :-( =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1505072.5guMhp2qJe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSWtjdAAoJELAdA+zwE4YeJpIH/2fRIrl/IChyys2pFDZun/Dm Bv18LsbIofllJy17HFFuAyTY5BtA+a+kqTH4fIfGjD2kFInnNWVBFnD9czMA03kD ogjRQG1Jc+VhBBQ3jMLnWpbgx7FWxaECAynUDb133Kvo1bdiuNey7mKF776w/hq/ kKrRA7f0nGoxrD6DyhQ0FNbO9HmoBEH5kYTJ6wO3aGGdPYF7r3E6nxiXcy2Yuuss rtzPwnIW98KVoMQn2k8EtIvlvBkro1HyuwUM93GKBuHYSgc4UJ/xRDOw6PS4bGhf uCL3hhcuQdDTpkhJldUJkDRyYfo2vhjihHueOSkVP+cH0AkMo2ixGkgWBNONfdg= =s6Kh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1505072.5guMhp2qJe--