From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1097A1381F3 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA756E0AA4; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD78E0A9D for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq15so8785424wib.12 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:19:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=R3mWbgsXjTJt1bHqSxRDpzEfyknhobMeHAhZiMqyOZs=; b=Z0yfH5SqgZWfQihVaFT3g4Z3QrVfijRD1A1SNFkqWB1pNqJ+6y5OTP5h2WaqXZ0/mF bTlC9/YEpVsqWb2SPxsUHVEH47DpexvWm+JmZ0poL2ANaArzwu/sOLQRPPuBxgZjHgrX xUZs0mixNOhUxQ4eEC6/BlBcQz04BIT+ZonxEdbBPclh5D0bsV712RT+DoZLlS/TcJUm PmpOSzucOOxMtXNgdwqlf3PyvfeiseOeqQxjeJNF/CwDpvlKec8utwcDzAEsMu6+/UW6 aYIXv8dxfV3CCWUTTlHxQEfviYCSTQbbFqQVItx+njOh55ZqIO9DDqjvubOIXoGpAWsB JL5A== X-Received: by 10.180.83.228 with SMTP id t4mr3955514wiy.12.1381342790377; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vidovic (113.141.89.92.rev.sfr.net. [92.89.141.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ma3sm17748216wic.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nicolas Sebrecht Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:20:32 +0200 From: Nicolas Sebrecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource? Message-ID: <20131009182032.GA7370@vidovic> References: <52483B41.7000206@xunil.at> <52494A69.1060201@xunil.at> <5249AFD9.3050100@googlemail.com> <5249C1BF.1030500@xunil.at> <5249D901.7020606@xunil.at> <524A874C.8010309@xunil.at> <20131001123225.GE31116@nicolas-desktop.logifi.fr> <524AD589.7010305@xunil.at> <524B20AF.6040305@xunil.at> <52556E04.80609@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52556E04.80609@xunil.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 0a58242d-13df-456b-b20c-09f8fdd4a3bc X-Archives-Hash: 7f662ab030cbbafe95f925c5f6601271 On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:53:56PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > Would someone please take a look at this dmesg: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24516209/dmesg.txt > > and tell me what those ugly messages around the CPUs could mean? > > I still see suboptimal performance on this hardware ... I would think about a kernel bug first and try with a much lower version. -- Nicolas Sebrecht