From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602421381F3 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48885E0B52; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C78E0B40 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MOwGd-1VPx8g1V2d-005WGX; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 09:41:46 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 08:41:44 -0500 From: Bruce Hill To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Network failed and weird error message Message-ID: <20131005134144.GP10604@server> References: <524EE833.8030905@gmail.com> <524F1885.7050806@gmail.com> <524F22EC.60808@gmail.com> <524FD3DD.5030304@gmail.com> <524FE4C1.8020708@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <524FE4C1.8020708@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:J9SlGoikSbN9l6pKmHBIulVTjkusWj0Y06o/0J3avol lgRzV0pgd4o4gCbwehXu2WAUvPclhjWt9xK5447yPYliGZGMmF meVolp6lj8sa9qO8BvPAFUwPHwJqR4sCRBhpoxfVT4veLzEwZ+ jVeIofWlPjbD9g0hezTR3SHzHdMAUAQG+66Dp6GrzN8aQt6FO4 RUkPi8370aS5QkHNfuTEK6DonlQachJTXM6zmRfbg4a5VrKBRn Sq7Ftotcn0tBpRPiRgXzxzP7GlBLiocGRm8fVIP6o1M7eS3P4M 9RWlzzCpsNhtMZTODyxMSmgOskl4E0SZd93RtmctMsGyLb+U4y tlqZUnC66O8ouCnSOXhI= X-Archives-Salt: 74875603-a97c-492f-91e7-611eed15e9bc X-Archives-Hash: ebe9f8f015dda1f940f0b1755e25dee6 On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 05:06:57AM -0500, Dale wrote: > > > > Just remove ohci and uhci from the kernel config > > > > > > These days all you need is ehci for usb2 and xhci for usb3 (unless you > > are using ancient hardware with physical usb1 ports) > > > > Well, I'm not sure about my UPS. It could be old school usb1. My mouse > and keyboard is PS/2 tho. > > One additional note. It has ran all day with no problems that I have > seen. > > Dale The issue is not what interface the UPS uses, but the port(s) on your mobo. "lspci -k" will show which kernel drivers your USB controller(s) use You can also look at the mobo manual, or plug the model # in the manufacturer's website, and check it's specifications. Very doubtful you have USB 1.{0,1}, and iirc, almost, if not every, EHCI controller has an integrated Transaction Translator so that you don't need UHCI/OHCI anymore. Cheers Homie! -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ support@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting