From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA211381F3 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60925E0B6C; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mercure.logifi.fr (mercure.logifi.fr [46.218.80.243]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4690DE0B0A for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercure.logifi.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140794846B for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:32:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mercure.logifi.fr Received: from mercure.logifi.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercure.logifi.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-RJs-zAZEU4; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:32:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nicolas-desktop.logifi.fr (unknown [192.168.8.70]) by mercure.logifi.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 960F048481; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:32:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:32:25 +0200 From: Nicolas Sebrecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource? Message-ID: <20131001123225.GE31116@nicolas-desktop.logifi.fr> References: <52455F01.4060102@xunil.at> <5245AA7D.1090903@googlemail.com> <52483B41.7000206@xunil.at> <52494A69.1060201@xunil.at> <5249AFD9.3050100@googlemail.com> <5249C1BF.1030500@xunil.at> <5249D901.7020606@xunil.at> <524A874C.8010309@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <524A874C.8010309@xunil.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 9da9ec02-8c3a-45da-b445-2602942b9488 X-Archives-Hash: f5be1e8fd7f57ee32b541b18ebe70d5c The 01/10/13, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > I used split and tar to split the image-file into 100 MB parts and rsync > them over right now. > > Maybe I have something wrong in my kernel ... the server shows a load of > around 3 ... while only the rsync is running and my mosh-session ... > > This is a 24-core-system ... it shouldn't even blink ... If you are sure the load don't come from userland (htop?), I would think about reporting a kernel bug. This might be an issue with the NIC driver. -- Nicolas Sebrecht