From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DEB1381F3 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74446E0ED9; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67250E0D76 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MLeY7-1VPRCw1nkZ-000qhY; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 20:32:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:32:20 -0500 From: Bruce Hill To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 Message-ID: <20130928003220.GF23408@server> References: <20130927222109.GD23408@server> <5246079E.7090406@gmail.com> <20130927223916.GE23408@server> <52460D42.2080109@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52460D42.2080109@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Ln47b7m2Do4QpvKL3DQ2XQxWGdped1CsY8xggZb3Fjb DMe5+YLsaV7ccHudc1w7KLIJKA3pU5UBE+JOcob8hCdNQKcaSc vRyIPTaoSZj5aikRSE+My7K+kiCRIrql4ppL9Z6zd6Dt5TOT/V Tp8aHb+p2sEsLZzQ8KPhRobyHoeBfkUrAJmONIHMHTC3k7xEek dAdoLrypVOuTMf5iPGhOQM7QPyaOES4F+WzfXQ3G0g55tQVnGK dOmaOUe8T77QFCSjzpVo4KAzXkeoguwh78pmvCj6KQs4Y7EJby LzwJNRmLrQY750B7bIMQdUxfbEqlsytU5aQGOM92FeneNWJzMX vABQMTTuQSswhtwVGO1AX8h871VSM/HsWx/+BpNL1 X-Archives-Salt: e796f8a3-2c52-4444-a210-cdec13767f04 X-Archives-Hash: c69b4207fd5d7d401fc0c9c6c88a83c5 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:57:06PM -0500, Dale wrote: > Bruce Hill wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Dale wrote: > >> I'm hoping that since I use eudev, I don't have to worry about this. > >> If I do, this could get interesting, again. Dale > > Do you have /usr separate from / ? > > Yep. From my understanding tho, eudev is not supposed to be affected by > this problem tho. > > One reason for this being seperate, I have / and /boot on a regular > partition and everything else on LVM. Sometimes that /usr gets a bit > full. It's not so bad after I moved all the portage stuff out and put > it in /var. Now I have to watch /var too. lol > > Dale You need to read the blog post listed in the news item, as it's not just specific to udev anymore. -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ support@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting