From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997EE1381F3 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A3B0E0EEE; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4635BE0E6E for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MQRKW-1VHvRS2nqW-00Ud6l; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:22:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:22:37 -0500 From: Bruce Hill To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Q on portage's rational to re-emerge packages Message-ID: <20130927152237.GL22468@server> References: <1380270284.4038.0@numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de> <20130927103844.GA30072@x4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130927103844.GA30072@x4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:MEB6I586mjH/IT4wGq7zl5V6Pt2fgZONd/iPqgLy0p9 pz8WBobG66Lth3ln9DyvJwPMaKMyjonfUm6rpxArPj+UBeDB39 z4dLKH8uQjVg3XgKXMG6U1OSewD2ajGyM8KeQrJpbnhitjdmzi qf1PWjxxxhuZ5eqA15ZxZCrIC5vcKCuek+kFFspuom10fVKAFq ZuVr7J8NU7J4mQKD8QrByMhWqNL6+6oU24ziAGKArCI8BRqqb1 cI8cNaoetAlCRD9DNKjU4298vdNY4Y91bYOMvnbU1dvxyLwv6w smwjdobARMQBonkmSseP0U4eCBm2vHo57m0tbJf4f6Ta0zLvOp kSmbYh4T92mI5aYWx8L/13Q1S2PJlOYU0aoQ5oR8s X-Archives-Salt: 5eb9773d-c870-4ac9-b362-67cbea8b04f2 X-Archives-Hash: 527f3125e9375c984bfcf3ce8996825d On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:38:44PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2013.09.27 at 10:24 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > Hi, > > would anybody please be so kind to explain to me the rational used by > > portage to re-emerge > > some packages. > > > > I've installed portage 2.2.7 and when I try to emerge, say, > > app-shells/zsh-completions > > it re-emerges (emerge -vp shows 'rR') several packages including, > > i.e., app-office/libreoffice > > > > I can't imaging libreoffice depends in any way on zsh-completions. > > > > So, what's going on? > > It's fallout from dev-python/python-exec-2.0... > Maybe Michał can explain why it's necessary to rebuild libreoffice. I've had plenty of grief over python-exec-0.3.1 getting depcleaned a couple days ago. Rebuilding each pkg effected works, but what about the ones you miss? Such as, no mail this morning... getmail stopped working. I've just now "re-emerge python-exec:0" and will live with that until Michał gets this fixed. Should we report here: https://bitbucket.org/mgorny/python-exec/issues/ -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ support@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting