public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Hill <daddy@happypenguincomputers.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Q on portage's rational to re-emerge packages
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:22:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130927152237.GL22468@server> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130927103844.GA30072@x4>

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:38:44PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.09.27 at 10:24 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > would anybody please be so kind to explain to me the rational used by  
> > portage to re-emerge
> > some packages.
> > 
> > I've installed portage 2.2.7 and when I try to emerge, say,    
> > app-shells/zsh-completions
> > it re-emerges (emerge -vp shows  'rR') several packages including,  
> > i.e., app-office/libreoffice
> > 
> > I can't imaging libreoffice depends in any way on zsh-completions.
> > 
> > So, what's going on?
> 
> It's fallout from dev-python/python-exec-2.0...
> Maybe Michał can explain why it's necessary to rebuild libreoffice.

I've had plenty of grief over python-exec-0.3.1 getting depcleaned a couple
days ago. Rebuilding each pkg effected works, but what about the ones you
miss? Such as, no mail this morning... getmail stopped working.

I've just now "re-emerge python-exec:0" and will live with that until Michał
gets this fixed.

Should we report here: https://bitbucket.org/mgorny/python-exec/issues/
-- 
Happy Penguin Computers               >')
126 Fenco Drive                       ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801                       ^^
support@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting


  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-27 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-27  8:24 [gentoo-user] Q on portage's rational to re-emerge packages Helmut Jarausch
2013-09-27  9:09 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-09-27  9:28   ` Helmut Jarausch
2013-09-27 10:43     ` Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2013-09-27 11:18       ` Philip Webb
2013-09-27 11:53         ` Neil Bothwick
2013-09-27 22:22         ` Alan McKinnon
2013-10-08 13:13           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2013-10-08 14:04             ` Khumba
2013-10-08 19:11               ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2013-09-27 10:38 ` [gentoo-user] " Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-09-27 15:22   ` Bruce Hill [this message]
2013-10-08 20:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Markos Chandras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130927152237.GL22468@server \
    --to=daddy@happypenguincomputers.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox