From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDC51381F3 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19354E0B49; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from karnak.local (cpc25-lutn10-2-0-cust565.9-3.cable.virginmedia.com [82.15.90.54]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F15E0B21 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from karnak.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by karnak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251122025 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:44:50 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:44:36 +0100 From: David W Noon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? Message-ID: <20130910164436.0c731d66@karnak.local> In-Reply-To: <3759525.SOi1g9OaYi@wstn> References: <522DD0A1.5010207@libertytrek.org> <1823961.b6Gd6v5fYI@wstn> <20130910144824.GA2682@bifrost.fritz.box> <3759525.SOi1g9OaYi@wstn> Organization: Luton Operatic Society X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/iQbGmqu12.s+e7D8sm1RmBW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 1d05b7f4-ed1e-41e1-a59d-843861e0c370 X-Archives-Hash: 9df130d5282cdde3fcd3111c1fa56b73 --Sig_/iQbGmqu12.s+e7D8sm1RmBW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:28:55 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?: > On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 16:48:24 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: >=20 > > Try [adding] -userpriv to your FEATURES (as in > > FEATURES=3D"-userpriv") in make.conf >=20 > Nope. Didn't help. >=20 > I see mention of "usersync" in the bug conversation, but I don't know > what that means. >=20 > I'll just wait for the fixed version, I think. I did the following: chown -R portage:portage /usr/portage /var/lib/portage /usr/local/portage and that fixed things. This assumes you use a userid of "portage" in a group named "portage" to maintain your system. --=20 Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* dwnoon@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* --Sig_/iQbGmqu12.s+e7D8sm1RmBW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIvPnEACgkQc9/LpQ70v4/c5gCeJ9QekExgVDE8jXr8TvUYlzAM KzoAnipRMERHM0O/OdhMxraDQcLFVHp5 =zgog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/iQbGmqu12.s+e7D8sm1RmBW--