From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6971381F3 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 024E1E0D64; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C130FE0D39 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 16:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p60so724092wes.28 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:53:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=8ceT9b1TzoG7qw+jRC23fPCQDl2/SEDPuMzS/TptSZc=; b=KnKOtNhAhL59NUZccde6lpep58ucnTqrLcCjQNCmgmqrqxAPrAAXPnFcWXpP9pCwQ3 vsXFTEJYpMkC/yKZKQhMra7aJtJ0n2XG9j2zUZqTp5jgP7aBHEP0td9APrdtf5sGmvkG 9oOQjVsVM08I9dMnlwwkpSIpavLV2dlNXQFnL88s0faYSNQVyZiVQFfdCQiEfdwjiEel 83ejsaYnn0qCt7mdKlfJrlbbeA6/CLVmTJpD/JhdQZ97J9rp1WiS+NfliiG4DAoBSCUK Aa23EuvkvG2MjRoDFE8ZuW0DrOZhxS6H3QHQaepirgMd/HMxiJ/dDWZk/u5GzOmBHabg UEAQ== X-Received: by 10.194.103.226 with SMTP id fz2mr136750wjb.52.1378054418509; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jf2sm11721576wic.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:53:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PMTUD Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 17:53:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201309011643.52008.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1530565.1L7SYr9WXS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201309011753.17624.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 10ad53ea-affa-4c90-9277-a05023093600 X-Archives-Hash: f38a07fd83484467b003c0eaaaaf33ae --nextPart1530565.1L7SYr9WXS Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 01 Sep 2013 17:17:37 Grant wrote: > OK, does PMTUD lower the outgoing packet size on my system due to the > hotel router's lower MTU or does the hotel router itself fragment my > 1500 byte packets in order to send them out? Just curious. If you are sending out packets with the DF bit set no fragmentation will ta= ke=20 place - the packet is dropped and an appropriate message is returned to=20 sender. Otherwise the router will fragment them and send them on to the=20 recipient address. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1530565.1L7SYr9WXS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSI3D9AAoJELAdA+zwE4YejGcH/27Mohp5kHjl3X2HsQDZR9Hd jKbt7GFQw4Uba3xUcF+GwcC7+FsCVVCnEWlMSDD/b8/guaDvuqrnli1MJNBVwJLA OX/GEhHArQUF0hlYmYmsOhY5p5Pft16csjtAzDLcNKa/f49qrq6rxxnZdL/L0v4S EsRQWjuH/2VHWbpSJkMvyKtOQMRkMMWewPnyaZXk7QfC/wVG3rDImXmeWFtVpoy0 ffqG801I17m3lhnVocYqq1C+yOPi3EcL+9UzabC/astT1v+W9xnoCdOmLUmeEasa LAcRgIjtBL+eCK1A7IYVs837z5N5pV38lLKHP9SbfBAmSJF/5CBQ+FdzFN4WWL8= =bZ60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1530565.1L7SYr9WXS--