From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709271381F3 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AA19E0D95; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025C5E0CB1 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t61so2514588wes.28 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:45:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=J21HSdqtJq5PvhDqQdSJkT2FYLPMPZCkYlu1awJGOa4=; b=ou1Zoykh8WVZ2G6/L8T5raAWvbDiejmYsH3bdfj5/QHzf0Y2oiLHva59Sjv3kjVkbJ 7B1ZdVZ9Xt3kONzeBVfRakHuljmcPT2Y/j6+ANM/MsSnLT0iJ8z3lZb2GNxE6D0Z9E0O JDi9wfaPqIeq3q/fja1wNGPNKi01KQ3yTRupbGRuGPMbVj+ASaH7t+Flm4/VocUxMBu3 Vtbl/p27L3YIthm9EY+lJk+D2/VBJ9cR1GncUiSyFH0g696vCDBH7KtYgqyDaauuAa2A ikLPSPqJCa8iK6szflQv5LNoiXS2mhpOCm9Z5TGj7uSBSFbR9iIE4DRL1dnUanVbKePR Ar4g== X-Received: by 10.180.10.136 with SMTP id i8mr6754199wib.46.1377506747562; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm16462153wiw.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:45:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Optional /usr merge in Gentoo Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:45:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <521A7EE9.8000706@gmail.com> <20130826080613.617af421@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130826080613.617af421@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart12527286.VahyixHl2o"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201308260945.28938.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 4432ee29-dd4f-4bd5-b7d9-d18e234bf3c5 X-Archives-Hash: b2bfd0b3591b0d83e82e515fa8ad8478 --nextPart12527286.VahyixHl2o Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 26 Aug 2013 08:06:13 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:02:17 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Eh? *Who* has ZFS? Certainly not the linux kernel. > >=20 > > FreeBSD > >=20 > > You can get ZFS on Linux with relative ease, you just have to build it > > yourself. Distros feel they can't redistribute that code. >=20 > emerge zfs works too :) >=20 > I really liek the way ZFS just lets you get on with things. Does anyone run it on a desktop/laptop as their day to day fs? Any drawbac= ks=20 or gotchas? Other than reliability, how does it perform compared say to ex= t4? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart12527286.VahyixHl2o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSGxWoAAoJELAdA+zwE4YeImgIAInM4VkyXRxWT+Lk2cS9O+1e 9hEYOHXzSJBEvjvQxSkvC6Pb/n5FrdMJ1zAtvxhNvPIq1lo7y3NaMTPw8bEUSAJA JeoDlS1CRBp0gP+QND577PL8s4fS+Ir9/KQIJJA+S+1EJFkE/SU+MB+X99g10sCK aQ4D8PI6Uclih42kzin/I7VWvLu3MU6NHOAYQGEncgJrT3of7NL7F9S3efo1oppK pWnPACj5fOyQDjmbu1qT2A88CEHe2U3NoWpQp6lu2PEopfu+IMJlinWqX/b80vRa 00MaCmXlEQJyDc453lQ2D1G/m9IkfnsxgR1RibHi7irpyVAnZSPOiKIcUu5+Ngk= =pO1L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart12527286.VahyixHl2o--