From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0877D1381F3 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7522AE0C85; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C0FE0B1F for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x12so1602005wgg.35 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 04:41:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=/E2gk3768B0/xWE039NY2WE2cXWMq2vmPCZWFQQpx/A=; b=fU9RHJUu9IOLJDQUaWD4gK5HQt8g36r46696rtWsc7DZf6mVNLqyeVhwCK+6HTCCWx 9rhwgxO4k+MnrUdB7pbopiJmW93CTPSuMRYBBTDrWTQbMI2jouomR+RjVgPik6vJjDXN MRL3WXAlQ9iPe2pMhbY95VBU69JNMzo6bIrhO68R3lCMPGEoM93olVajOZg9z3Zdmdov 2Q+gr/XG2zFK4zblljVv8yL6aDABpyfjngimoXAxX/E1gQPvHK4ALc6wX1G5WOQUdlcF E0BZDE631c3McQx05Qk2ZTWHJDrYxpKlPhuFqWWU8NAmXCx6zEgWhB3Ov7IBuNeAWw5w vgUQ== X-Received: by 10.180.92.98 with SMTP id cl2mr4069507wib.15.1377430898969; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 04:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eb3sm10221406wic.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Aug 2013 04:41:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Makeing /dev/rtc1 accessible as soon as possible - how? Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:41:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20130825040413.GA3342@solfire> <4377678.WRVoGkbejG@bluering> <20130825103529.GA3355@solfire> In-Reply-To: <20130825103529.GA3355@solfire> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2716004.nJcRcPqDM4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201308251241.21414.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 9101af5c-d775-4230-a7b9-c33a368b648f X-Archives-Hash: d9e3ccce7d045a59625a3b7763f4c693 --nextPart2716004.nJcRcPqDM4 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 25 Aug 2013 11:35:29 meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: > Paul Colquhoun [13-08-25 12:04]: > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 06:04:13 meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > There are two RTCs in my system: > > > /dev/rtc0 and /dev/rtc1 > > >=20 > > > rtc0 is not powered by a battery and forgets time/date > > > with system shutdown and rtc1 is a I2C-rtc (DS3231) which > > > is powered by a battery. It is extremly accurate in comparison > > > with rtc0. > > >=20 > > > rtc0 is accessible with system boot - rtc1 is not (current state). > >=20 > > I know this might be obvious, but just in case: > >=20 > > Have you checked to see if the dud RTC can be disabled in the BIOS? > >=20 > > Or completely remove its drivers from the kernel? >=20 > Hi Paul, >=20 > I cannot remove rtc0 since it is integrated into the CPU. I cannot > remove the CPU for various reasons... ;) >=20 > I put the script (see previous mail) into /etc/init.d and call it now > at sysinit times. This works so far...but I still have entries in /sys > and /proc which show 1.1.1970. >=20 > Is there any way to get rid of the need to use "echo..bla..bla" into > files of the sysfs but to give the kernel the needed informations > directly, so rtc1 is available to the kernel...? I noticed you mentioned rtc0 is not powered by a battery, but that's what t= he=20 CMOS battery does. I'm curious why you don't add a new CMOS battery to you= r=20 MoBo? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart2716004.nJcRcPqDM4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSGe1hAAoJELAdA+zwE4Ye5NcIAMAhEkvOGbvp5YG+Smz/3/Pv NiFooL+cULtP3HBYZPfSe+BTlqAvStMob7xDbxj79N/8cnwJyG5nFI2rPbhPQchw bwTwXLwOD3+M1T0ShNwHRZYFIBIp3hyLlSnI380GaZYyIXI+F8u1bwDQof9d5a5k qYEC8h9lsehCPyWy8LuCBLJ2DDOOAG+xEpOsQO48OtlUS1eT3wTavOdJK6iTP60E atogSRmqGYWHoU6tL+5G5sHwL9Y/iZClyKnDdYOQscqxWLLZhn5No0sHbaMpFgby cDZrvCZ0rzGJMANKZUV8x5IWBbVSfkHX7PVZPKK0eMdLrxHzW9TocNEe3s7+RHc= =ACzn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2716004.nJcRcPqDM4--