From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681031381F3 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79BCEE0D92; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7425DE0D53 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28E933EB12 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:13:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.296 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.296 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.504, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.799, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySEecO-zJKpu for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE9A33EB20 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VD5Da-0002zr-DX for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 06:12:54 +0200 Received: from wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net ([174.76.82.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 06:12:54 +0200 Received: from boxcars by wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 06:12:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: The NVIDIA/Kernel fiasco -- is it safe to sync yet? Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 23:12:39 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: <20130823231239.4d4df2db@fuchsia.remarqs.net> References: <20130823180959.GA13353@artifex> <1746861.kq9W4Fkxay@apollo> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: c10ca72e-20da-4f7b-b782-2bf806866820 X-Archives-Hash: ca6f2555c0e166a5e69f1411b1fe93ee On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:15:40 +0200 Paul Klos wrote: > Op vrijdag 23 augustus 2013 14:09:59 schreef Randy Westlund: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > > > Are "regular" nvidia users who run a completely stable system > > > (with only stable nvidia-drivers and stable gentoo-sources) > > > affected by any of this? > > > > I believe so. I run testing, but this just cleared up for me a few > > days ago when I went to kernel 3.10.7 (stable). I'm currently > > running kernel 3.10.9 and nvidia-drivers 325.15 (both testing), > > which works just fine. Try it and see what happens. > > Updated to gentoo-sources 3.10.7 (stable) today. I had (stable) > x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-319.32 which failed rebuilding. After > keywording x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers I'm on 325.15 as well. Seems to > be fine so far. Same here, amd64 It looks like maybe the best way to tell which ebuilds support which kernels is to read the conditional for the ewarn message in each ebuild.