From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149927-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F2A1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:10:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB9D7E0C84;
	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:10:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com (mail-qc0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3F8E0C22
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:10:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c1so507731qcz.5
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=RkN5lFvR1alEiS/mPqaczgqp4HS5ubVZ0aM1GgmHTuE=;
        b=AypLoKdTj1+TWXam+3znXqf/zEPfuKFZuDSuI8eszMpu6PIcRb5LUb3eZLxsVT2ktW
         sV0DhSazV3nXq2c0DlK+wq9Jg6p4/HnktiE6/G5YbwEbJB6xUcYu4CF5fFxkDv501TkE
         ZQEIoyrAyJLenn2GsI8bX5knjoqzpA5/sm4jeK9da0J2xFpqY/BrHQNdCT+FoH3bdxmE
         X4T5Pp3AEMXuXr7+9kcTClJIZR3yl0POnWDJYFPdRDRL+mXv5DJMpH2bzc4TwybvYugB
         D1OsJHVN2FIjV5N0MAo24UNLxHLRyI30ZDoJy6FgrW1+SBcixDlze52PmU2YHc6Y8Sll
         QRSQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.24.195 with SMTP id w3mr482514qab.5.1377281401722;
        Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.gmail.com:587 (c-98-216-247-110.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.216.247.110])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm1359986qev.8.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.gmail.com:587 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:09:59 -0400
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:09:59 -0400
From: Randy Westlund <rwestlun@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] The NVIDIA/Kernel fiasco -- is it safe to sync yet?
Message-ID: <20130823180959.GA13353@artifex>
References: <CAPi0psvLOdmZF36td8Y6ajo0Pj033=C4_CpZWvOTMaRzng05jw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPi0psvLOdmZF36td8Y6ajo0Pj033=C4_CpZWvOTMaRzng05jw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: abb09ac8-494e-4764-aa73-581f80ff85bc
X-Archives-Hash: 69c580ffe35be68244ec320f4ca92b53

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Are "regular" nvidia users who run a completely stable system (with
> only stable nvidia-drivers and stable gentoo-sources) affected by any
> of this?

I believe so.  I run testing, but this just cleared up for me a few days ago when I went to kernel 3.10.7 (stable).  I'm currently running kernel 3.10.9 and nvidia-drivers 325.15 (both testing), which works just fine.  Try it and see what happens.

Randy