From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CF41381F3 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A8C8E0BC5; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A3CE0AB3 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8]) by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3CFA02211A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:49:30 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:49:24 +0100 From: Neil Bothwick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon Message-ID: <20130815214924.789c42cb@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130815203216.GB14883@linux1> References: <20130802203646.GA3926@linux1> <20130814084336.1c295d16@dartworks.biz> <20130814200438.GA11599@linux1> <20130815001205.46091f26@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20130815203216.GB14883@linux1> Organization: Digital Media Production X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2-71-gace330 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667 FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/L9Dj94TsqF4ptqH3IY.YhNP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: cdbc2e10-0a74-4dfa-9d42-0d18935ce772 X-Archives-Hash: 3172cce4f4d421ce9d4fd87f51810937 --Sig_/L9Dj94TsqF4ptqH3IY.YhNP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:32:16 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > I've tried the update on two systems, both with modified config files > > (the second one modified just before the upgrade to see if that made a > > difference). The first one lost it's file, the second one kept it. =20 >=20 > On the first one, you said that you had modified /etc/conf.d/net. > Had you upgraded OpenRC since you modified /etc/conf.d/net on that > system? The first one had a static address set up in conf.d/net, set up years ago, and the file disappeared on upgrading to openrc-0.12 >=20 > If yes, that may be the pattern I need. >=20 > The first version of OpenRC on that system was earlier than 0.11.8, and > you modified /etc/conf.d/net before 0.11.8 was on that system, then you > upgraded to 0.11.8 then 0.12 without touching /etc/conf.d/net. Is that > right? Yes, the file was last modified on Dec 6yh 2012, at which time I had openrc-0.11.7. --=20 Neil Bothwick What do you have when you have six lawyers buried up to their necks in sand? Not enough sand. --Sig_/L9Dj94TsqF4ptqH3IY.YhNP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlINPtoACgkQum4al0N1GQNBvQCghFsuilUYQ7Lk7sZWYayad9l6 N78An2DDt8TJhNejVpj0a7XZZgWd5N5v =//CI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/L9Dj94TsqF4ptqH3IY.YhNP--