From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6731381F3 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0ED72E0B52; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B8F1E0B16 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML6mf-1V63GG3xPV-000YiB; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 08:59:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:59:09 -0500 From: Bruce Hill To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Browsers cannot access WWW while ping and host utilities work as expected. Message-ID: <20130805125909.GL25510@server> References: <201308042057.57917.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201308051107.03261.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201308051107.03261.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:7kDsDhBRwi6BjMoFuPY/JtgeTqi6Tl46gdvwaKB73y+ kPn6kyJ5nKT20nw7WhaCoEqBhqX6WJZo4J0heuNkTLhwqRm6jS QCUaFmvzCS++Cf5168Kj4cYfR7rzvXVZPsmVAmHqOmppQlxiGl 46j3phI9iPBpiaxcA8IbCI2vbJEtasfszj2VGRc+utiuVH8xgY VfnkOVCs0Flyn/bth7Ms6Tr/DrtQSj08S4z1K01BDicibKOYZJ Vjz3wtTV8Rgj6l242QjQ/dm9eSCzse8F82QRyKVHmTRFol1iya juw8ecNicS5Bqk+XzlMJGAkDUWEe3+wxO2UvRx93270zrImXk7 zPPyW/s/M7npaoBMfg80= X-Archives-Salt: 99f5d305-df60-46a1-98ae-c99f34b5dda8 X-Archives-Hash: 500eacda2f912675985cbf773b62a341 On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:06:52AM +0100, Mick wrote: > > > Suggestions of Michael Kintzios > > > > This is the new kernel naming scheme of NICs. Which-ever nomenclature > > > you decide to use, check that that's the only one having a symlink in > > > /etc/init.d to net.lo > > > > Yes, there is only enp2s15 links to lo in /etc/init.d > > The idea here is that you need consistent naming of your iface. If you have > settled on the kernel naming of enp2s15, then stick with this throughout your > configuration. > -- > Regards, > Mick If this is "the new kernel naming scheme of NICs", why this in dmesg: [ 4.725902] systemd-udevd[1176]: renamed network interface wlan0 to enp0s18f2u2 It looks as if systemd-udev renamed the NIC to me. Can you explain? Cheers, Bruce -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ support@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting