From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AACD1381F3 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6406FE0930; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D30E0888 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B5A33E953 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:31:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.157, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.452, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awPiqdlsud9U for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C38833E91A for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V3eAf-00028T-9A for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:30:53 +0200 Received: from wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net ([174.76.82.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:30:53 +0200 Received: from boxcars by wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:30:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo-systemd-only deprecation Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:30:39 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: <20130728223039.27df7e04@fuchsia.remarqs.net> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: bbe81a13-b112-4e7b-b88a-8b5ba72c8abd X-Archives-Hash: 91d508b66afffd7ad15482fe6de757f4 On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 03:22:02 -0500 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: > Basically, systemd is now a first class citizen in Gentoo (on par with > OpenRC), and therefore there is no need at all for using my overlay. > Thanks to all the people who helped me with pull requests and > comments; the deprecation of the overlay is great news, since now it's > officially possible in Gentoo to ditch OpenRC and switch completely to > systemd. Thanks for all the work everybody's done on this, and thanks in advance for all the work to come. The emphasis on choice is one of the main reasons I'm a Gentoo user, and it's good to see you care about providing choice for such an important thing as system manager. =20 And thanks for ensuring that no disruption was caused to those of us who continue to choose OpenRC. (Or IMO trivial disruption at worst, like the little bits of cruft that can be install-masked.) Another of the main reasons I use Gentoo is (well, was) the emphasis on proving thorough, clear information. I don't know enough about init systems to really judge, but looks very thorough, and it's definitely clear, so thanks for that too.