From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149029-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B511381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1235E0A84;
	Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:25:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.digimed.co.uk (82-69-83-178.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.83.178])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B9BE0A64
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 18:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from digimed.co.uk (shooty.digimed.co.uk [192.168.1.8])
	by mail.digimed.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D9E2B805E3
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:25:02 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:25:02 +0100
From: Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bash-completion change?
Message-ID: <20130728192502.343d665c@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <kt3hvb$sim$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CALxYTP67-HpBSaajbhYsghY3XH=-_h9erTfxuWnJoNbYy9X70A@mail.gmail.com>
	<ksual4$t3o$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<87txjhw2vh.fsf@nyu.edu>
	<ksuqa2$cv7$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<20130726214621.GG8023@server>
	<20130727002314.4ea164fe@digimed.co.uk>
	<87ppu42h2t.fsf@nyu.edu>
	<20130728170811.4fc812d7@digimed.co.uk>
	<kt3hvb$sim$1@ger.gmane.org>
Organization: Digital Media Production
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2-68-g4c94b2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7260 0F33 97EC 2F1E 7667  FE37 BA6E 1A97 4375 1903
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/oRO..Rg+7PwHgMtPEzt1fvV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 72fa6f45-8b7e-4e44-81c6-2d8804bb9b9a
X-Archives-Hash: db27fdd21fb5dbab01e861c6c7098476

--Sig_/oRO..Rg+7PwHgMtPEzt1fvV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:47:38 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> >> Yes we learned this trick a month or two ago. =20
> >
> > Apparently, not all of us. =20
>=20
> And apparently not even the Gentoo dev who put that message in the=20
> ebuild :-)

Is is portage 2.2 only? I don't have anything with portage 2.1 installed
to check.


--=20
Neil Bothwick

Top Oxymorons Number 38: Government organization

--Sig_/oRO..Rg+7PwHgMtPEzt1fvV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlH1Yf4ACgkQum4al0N1GQPDcQCgjQL8GsMSpgJY6L3CJPcRw/Ew
kpUAn3+NV8Gy/uWmW/YWgW//LcmvOiM4
=+Vvh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/oRO..Rg+7PwHgMtPEzt1fvV--