From: Silvio Siefke <siefke_listen@web.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade only to bigger Version
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:16:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130727001657.ac533a04be0955000aeae05d@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201307262043.53619.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:43:43 +0100 Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
wrote:
> You could mask any versions greater than >4.1.0.2 and lesser than
> <4.1.0.2 I guess, but instead you may want to give
> app-office/libreoffice-bin a spin which will save significant time
> when you need to update/downgrade this package.
I have now masked what you say, but the result is same, portage make
a downgrade.
emerge -s libreoffice without mask:
* app-office/libreoffice
Latest version available: 4.1.0.4
Latest version installed: 4.1.0.2
emerge -s libreoffice with mask:
* app-office/libreoffice
Latest version installed: 4.1.0.2
emerge -avuDN @world
[ebuild UD ] app-office/libreoffice-l10n-4.0.4.2 [4.1.0.2]
[ebuild UD ] dev-util/mdds-0.7.1:0/0 [0.8.1:0/0.8.1]
[ebuild UD ] dev-libs/liborcus-0.3.0:0/0 [0.5.1:0/0.5]
[ebuild UD ] app-office/libreoffice-4.0.4.2 [4.1.0.2]
Its really crazy. I have netbook and p4 desktop, i want not run
12 hours compile orgy for small upgrade which normal no one feel.
gentoomobile siefke # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
>app-office/libreoffice-4.1.0.2
>app-office/libreoffice-l10n-4.1.0.2
when use the follow entry, is the same, downgrade.
gentoomobile siefke # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
>=app-office/libreoffice-4.1.0.2
>=app-office/libreoffice-l10n-4.1.0.2
Ideas?
Thank you for help and nice weekend.
Silvio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-26 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 18:33 [gentoo-user] Upgrade only to bigger Version Silvio Siefke
2013-07-26 19:43 ` Mick
2013-07-26 22:16 ` Silvio Siefke [this message]
2013-07-26 22:43 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-07-26 22:48 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-07-27 0:58 ` Silvio Siefke
2013-07-26 22:51 ` Bruce Hill
2013-07-26 21:01 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2013-07-26 22:19 ` Silvio Siefke
2013-07-26 22:36 ` William Kenworthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130727001657.ac533a04be0955000aeae05d@web.de \
--to=siefke_listen@web.de \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox