From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB59B1381F3 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9C7EE0929; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from internet.com.uy (correo.tecnet.com.uy [200.40.123.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9881EE08E0 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acme7.acmenet (r186-55-139-137.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.55.139.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by correo.tecnet.com.uy (8.14.4/8.14.4/host-001) with ESMTP id r6KC02Tn004815 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:00:09 -0300 X-TN_STAT: 25 Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 08:59:57 -0300 From: luis jure To: gentoo-user Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SSD partitioning and migration Message-ID: <20130720085957.5fa06ca8@acme7.acmenet> In-Reply-To: <51EA3F5B.6000509@coolmail.se> References: <20130718182232.5c1301ce@acme7.acmenet> <51E8E30E.20906@gmail.com> <20130719114234.332ff09e@acme7.acmenet> <51E96CBB.4080300@gmail.com> <20130719200018.474e06af@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <51E9C5D2.1040108@gmail.com> <20130719202308.02520045@acme7.acmenet> <51EA3F5B.6000509@coolmail.se> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (correo.tecnet.com.uy [200.40.123.43]); Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:00:16 -0300 (UYT) X-Archives-Salt: 3e0569ce-6b23-4ee7-b9c7-552821a1e932 X-Archives-Hash: b34303fe75ef2155cd0396903ffca7af on 2013-07-20 at 09:42 pk wrote: > On 2013-07-20 01:23, luis jure wrote: > > > hehe... i guess neil meant that in average for each Tb you have in your > > disk, only 125Mb is really important or useful. the rest is crap that > > just piles up... > > > > No, 1Tb = 125GB (note the difference between Tb = Tbit and TB=TByte)... haha, yes, someone else mentioned that already. silly me, i didn't pay attention to the lowercase b... i really thought neil was saying that in jest! anyway, i think there is something in the idea that for each TB in their hard disks, the average home user has lots of useless crap. i know *i* do...