From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-148748-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198521381F3 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51E92E0946; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from internet.com.uy (correo.tecnet.com.uy [200.40.123.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9B55E07D2 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acme7.acmenet (r186-55-116-56.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.55.116.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by correo.tecnet.com.uy (8.14.4/8.14.4/host-001) with ESMTP id r6JNYTQr004271 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:34:49 -0300 X-TN_STAT: 25 Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:34:31 -0300 From: luis jure <ljc@internet.com.uy> To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SSD partitioning and migration Message-ID: <20130719203431.28188b6e@acme7.acmenet> In-Reply-To: <20130719221124.GU3387@server> References: <20130718182232.5c1301ce@acme7.acmenet> <51E8E30E.20906@gmail.com> <20130719114234.332ff09e@acme7.acmenet> <51E96CBB.4080300@gmail.com> <20130719190059.56d4864b@acme7.acmenet> <20130719221124.GU3387@server> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (correo.tecnet.com.uy [200.40.123.43]); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:34:49 -0300 (UYT) X-Archives-Salt: 047a21f0-ede2-4aa0-9d8a-39f6daf72037 X-Archives-Hash: a2c761db0b9a0da19198a05d933cb618 on 2013-07-19 at 17:11 Bruce Hill wrote: > Do some meaningful benchmark... > > emerge -ajv app-benchmarks/bonnie++ && bonnie++ -d /tmp -u root > > then post us your output. mmm... /tmp is on the root partition that's only about 40 Gb (in my old HDD / was 30Gb, and that was enough, but sometimes i had to clean a bit to compile libreoffice, that checks for 6Gb free). apparently that's not enough for bonnie++ to run, so i mounted the other partition in the SSD and performed the benchmark there. here's the result : Using uid:0, gid:0. Writing a byte at a time...done Writing intelligently...done Rewriting...done Reading a byte at a time...done Reading intelligently...done start 'em...done...done...done...done...done... Create files in sequential order...done. Stat files in sequential order...done. Delete files in sequential order...done. Create files in random order...done. Stat files in random order...done. Delete files in random order...done. Version 1.97 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP acme7 24016M 571 98 261698 22 133029 14 4272 99 287927 12 8057 53 Latency 23779us 78780us 591ms 2378us 51825us 892ms Version 1.97 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- acme7 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 18593 19 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ Latency 2033us 419us 1322us 109us 4us 33us 1.97,1.97,acme7,1,1374260412,24016M,,571,98,261698,22,133029,14,4272,99,287927,12,8057,53,16,,,,,18593,19,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,23779us,78780us,591ms,2378us,51825us,892ms,2033us,419us,1322us,109us,4us,33us can you read that? i'm afraid i don't know much what those numbers mean in terms of performance...