From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796D21381F3 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 810FEE0AFE; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C43E0AD3 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m15so8847511wgh.23 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=HKFObWIYVGYhr5QUFbOoYMKPzccCpBI8P+BbchoRqUY=; b=WA24EXpBXdmrbYXPpOR0wlL1wY7Y9y9ZskTs3I/mrwKnecRPCFLIm69zlmB1RxsC+y 46GdDUypj5iG1N1pxYeQd4UTgHtMKh8Jgf15/1lzb2IzQmsayU8yNkFwYiqCl4Rssqy0 13NyL/AtzBFfZoa1z+oM2TDPGl3ByJ8iTSUMeQqxwH91WEvdZEsEno7jjo8YCIrTdwts WdRGZoKFaLimRPT6pg0pQY8LNz0M+GrSTTT5lK+Cj+5S62Hre5zTd/U+o9kQDiIJKgIn lYdILoMZ9JX6C7F9CHMlOJHLdGs+LdXN7VJtwI9U93p69/9O4ONpoa6ZSVpbvIo8T3UW L1bA== X-Received: by 10.180.98.231 with SMTP id el7mr3950977wib.33.1373715837774; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id em10sm8408374wid.1.2013.07.13.04.43.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Jul 2013 04:43:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] k3b burning BD-Disk pretends to fail at 99.99% Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:43:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.13-gentoo; KDE/4.10.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <4789664.JvAW5a2jYR@zeus> <14437625216571153026@scdbackup.webframe.org> In-Reply-To: <14437625216571153026@scdbackup.webframe.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1406235.lJeO7gqAMU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201307131243.48202.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: b1b211bb-e18f-4e01-94bb-85c5cfe51386 X-Archives-Hash: 326fe0692f44f670e1bbf19a9ee84a75 --nextPart1406235.lJeO7gqAMU Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 13 Jul 2013 11:08:07 Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, >=20 > > attemting to create a > > BD-RE disk (Re-recordables are nice, sine non-RW media don't grow in my > > garden ;-) >=20 > Yeah. A BD-R tree would be a fine thing. >=20 > Note that growisofs on BD-RE would not show the bug at the end. > It happens only with BD-R which you submit in blank state. >=20 > If you treat your BD-R with dvd+rw-format before using them, > the bug should not show up. >=20 > If you can talk K3b into using growisofs option > -use-the-force-luke=3Dspare:none > then it will not format the blank BD-R, work with full nominal > speed, and should not show the bug. (There will be no Defect > Management. So there will be no checkreading and no replacement > of bad blocks.) >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > I wrote a mail to media-optical@gentoo.org, proposing the patch > for growisofs. > Regrettably there was no reaction yet. >=20 > Maybe if enough Gentoo users complain ... Hi Thomas, this problem can either be fixed by patching growisofs as you=20 suggest, or by changing k3b to use cdrtools in preference to growisofs - no= t=20 sure if this can be done with a USE flag. The latter seems more reliable t= o=20 me, because Joerg keeps his code up to date, but I don't know enough to mak= e a=20 case for either option. Either way, perhaps the OP should file a quick bug report at=20 https://bugs.gentoo.org/ and mention both options as a request. Then the r= est=20 of us can chime in to encourage the devs to progress this. =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart1406235.lJeO7gqAMU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJR4T10AAoJELAdA+zwE4YecmAH/015xZOyi5dZnN0kh9a602Wk KIISWD/ChIEelNWEWsK6r2H7652ubeBn553qO6DWpDw1h4QDQ0r4I+/UQQqmgclL zvNKAF6MdP454Dxn6uludHBCKMe4bUR/KShSaeIBh3XjETscBqbop2xD1RrvRUzc IMPKfQTQELrr4SDVdMGs1DGrqAHE8XYWE5N3kbQV4bTUnLf71u8WCesj2/SQdM3f x0hfRTCcsHoAQQdppdGDcAdiIbvs92yS33QwNFnT977NADHdyP5Bo+9W+SjjqNF1 MfvXu8U+04GuSSuVqLm4WRzqIOfW0AouKG/1VGseohY60UVqV4eV4uaswLZxs5U= =eq9M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1406235.lJeO7gqAMU--