From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551791381F3 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DAF0E09FA; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3889EE09F0 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b47so4792996eek.21 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=2MunrjnO4ikxwv8eixiiVheHD9qVatnuYfLW3uYtNrk=; b=x7QtOzBKGNC6FFaz2g97odqQ/dUiK/d6m9+CgU+bryI8MIQNyqU8mOMME3SC4AKCn5 xe9B0nmEu/VNi0HxHcGVVB1+3Qm2VMTKbg5EKnmy4d1kQMzrV3tFeqELiXzGQpat+Lgq UIzOg4Hr5ii1jtzGWdnBPsLXnfmfaF5dr1zPF29oaZB2WYuLNKvbnBR4NqSv1ZaUpQzu GabeAmRQnG4fJecQAUjiizyH5QXuSYBIqpUZRZo9Idp8KbsYIOo3P9xw2lAnxxmbVAal P/Dw1Yn/Vetrq/d61ltxkZPq1u0Zs4FE14mpSe6aLiUsPtahpmQZx1yyKPMIBu0N6UVD 5IPQ== X-Received: by 10.14.98.6 with SMTP id u6mr35839563eef.62.1373466770088; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell_xps.localnet (230.3.169.217.in-addr.arpa. [217.169.3.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y1sm60453776eew.3.2013.07.10.07.32.48 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] syslog-ng-3.4: time_sleep() deprecated or not? Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:32:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.13-gentoo; KDE/4.10.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <51DC4FC5.5070409@gmail.com> <51DD3431.4090006@dmj.nu> <201307101130.18950.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201307101130.18950.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2278741.44FYpQGt1O"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201307101532.41316.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 75ef6124-f7eb-47ed-8d57-2dc1c82a9763 X-Archives-Hash: 647b27d13f359d834712751030a0b0be --nextPart2278741.44FYpQGt1O Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 10 Jul 2013 11:30:08 Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 10 Jul 2013 11:15:13 Dan Johansson wrote: > > On 09.07.2013 20:00, Jarry wrote: > > > Hi Gentoo-users, > > >=20 > > > today I updated syslog-ng on my server. When I checked config > > > file, I got this message: > > >=20 > > > # /etc/init.d/syslog-ng checkconfig > > > * Checking your configfile (/etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf) ... > > > WARNING: Your configuration file uses an obsoleted keyword, please > > > update your configuration; keyword=3D'time_sleep', change=3D'time_sle= ep() > > > has been deprecated since syslog-ng 3.3' [ ok ] > > > # > > >=20 > > > So I checked the new syslog-ng-ose-v3.4-guide-admin.pdf, > > > but there is nothing about time_sleep() being obsolete > > > or deprecated. Quite on the contrary: it is listed as > > > valid option, and even mentioned in the chapter 17 > > > "best practices" as a way of handling lots of parallel > > > connections. > > >=20 > > > So how is it then? Is time_sleep() supported and valid, > > > or obsolete/deprecated? > >=20 > > I also had some issues when I upgraded to 3.4. > > Most of the warnings went away when I changed the version string in > > syslog-ng.conf to "@version: 3.4". > >=20 > > Just my 2 cents (=E2=82=AC) >=20 > The new version runs a couple of useful checks on the syntax of the > configuration file - who would have thought that I had a duplicate > directive in there! O_o Hmm ... I just tried 'less /var/log/syslog' and I now get a binary file ... However, most parses it as text. Has something changed in less recently? =2D-=20 Regards, Mick --nextPart2278741.44FYpQGt1O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJR3XCJAAoJELAdA+zwE4YerWQH/jY18gGm8oJOLNosBvNatnto pTVVlIgQJmlBmT0I8hFuRdUAJLmeBLvkDYAIkjc0g+O/evKKKeSXPTrLg0urhZmI fZKHvZoKB7+gzJXj6BXoyrqOQplKvkgnkVfrfa0WBJPaUz4rSGP4KA8GhPKnWnKl /dS06BfX0mjeLVd1eqSjL8ooJwTIqsrrykrhBn231HG0IqXBGEg7FyBZ9vbdqeW5 CgqYljvgmWuNZCvY9q6sP23xlJNltWzpLW3QjoaulAVFU52yR+EH6IH2dDvyHne2 ytxXHyyZKUcd0qD7CxnWYzfd5HMYi6gfkO6w9e6zG/WQd0Am0lEfnUPZG/lpvPE= =3sbD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2278741.44FYpQGt1O--