From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FBC1381F3 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 13:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5BAFE09F4; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 13:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC18E09EF for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 13:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (66-208-231-133.ubr01a.rte20201.pa.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [66.208.231.133]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MQRnQ-1UgloW0KPE-00Tl3r; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:07:17 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 08:07:15 -0500 From: Bruce Hill To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2 compile error. Clock_gettime Message-ID: <20130629130715.GA3387@server> References: <51CA7510.6000107@gmail.com> <51CA7A0F.7060505@gentoo.org> <51CA8AB6.8050500@gmail.com> <51CA8F0E.6040608@gentoo.org> <51CC328B.6070008@gmail.com> <20130629015912.GB19743@waltdnes.org> <51CE4A12.7060106@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51CE4A12.7060106@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:zUI9SP1ozoOhgLVyQogp5iaSfDHDnePDRS3lDQCtnaA ijf4n/s3L3xvj/D6n5LkmLc6ngsEGxkA/MlXuijIlxiq8/F8/n IRyTv4yyKjbRpw5YdNN3YO/yANXZOHrkqek+dCt18wS8e43SyU rRe+teCmdVLJ72Mjme4w9kg6QR2cFxd7yFZy0crwFO4P2NLTKp dxAQcmV4jZCwsHyhRKAwLsAx008K4y5fQApkVU3O5WSr83LAlN dGIJXaC0VXHt8LNGlQh277mtjrQGbqhSLLAOOs+Bg+JJCxJwse S46jKbdsfQwDkorxKKmYXfmvtSxKwI77Csq3SlPmcLlNJ9juQ= = X-Archives-Salt: 38eb61cb-715f-4750-a0fc-ffb72fc95a9b X-Archives-Hash: 81435d2ffdcf623c61ca219a86128296 On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:44:34PM -0500, Dale wrote: > Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:39:39AM -0500, Dale wrote > > > >> Someone else ran into the same thing and it appears they use udev. So > >> switching wouldn't help anyway. > >> > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370217 > > Your bug-report comment shows... > > sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 USE="lvm1 readline static thin udev (-clvm) (-cman) (-selinux) -static-libs" > > > > Other comments note that unsetting "static" allows it to build. Try > > unsetting the "static" flag for lvm2 in package.use, i.e... > > > > sys-fs/lvm2 -static > > > > Does that build for you? > > > > > It might would but I can't recall WHY I set it to that. If I set it > that way in package.use, which is rare for me, then I had to have a good > reason. I need to start making notes on this stuff. ;-) > > It will likely be fixed pretty soon so as long as I don't have to > upgrade, I should be OK with the one installed now. It was just a > recompile from emerge -e world but I found it odd that it worked before > but not the other day. > > If I have to tho, I'll keep that in mind. You might want to run "enalyze rebuild use" to get an idea of what USE flags you have which do not match the default settings. Over the course of time the defaults change, and our need for certain options change, so it's good to run this and check any USE flags for situations such as yours above, where one would say, "I can't recall WHY I set it to that." If you can't find a reason then it's best to stick with the default settings most of the time. This is all that command will do on your system: mingdao@server ~ $ enalyze rebuild use -- Scanning installed packages for USE flag settings that do not match the default settings -- preparing pkgs for file entries - Saving file: /home/mingdao/package.use.test - Done Bruce -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ support@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting